Genomics
1 Transcripts
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcript:C34E10.7.1 | C34E10.7.1 |
3318
 |
III: 5240591-5244639 |
Other
1 CDSs
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDS:C34E10.7 | C34E10.7 |
579
|
III: 5240735-5240992 |
58 Allele
| Public Name |
|---|
| WBVar01263510 |
| WBVar01263511 |
| WBVar01263513 |
| ttTi44758 |
| WBVar00060031 |
| gk643272 |
| gk468215 |
| gk443311 |
| gk714218 |
| gk772429 |
| gk400669 |
| gk350184 |
| n3786 |
| gk960090 |
| gk670328 |
| gk707645 |
| gk592653 |
| gk934709 |
| gk621329 |
| ttTi18382 |
| gk174314 |
| gk174313 |
| gk385787 |
| gk756021 |
| gk689208 |
| gk474639 |
| gk174320 |
| gk321166 |
| gk174319 |
| gk825793 |
1 Chromosome Location
|
Feature . Primary Identifier |
Start | End | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBGene00000561 | 5240591 | 5244639 | -1 |
4 Data Sets
| Name | URL |
|---|---|
| WormBaseAcedbConverter | |
| GO Annotation data set | |
| C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene) | |
| Panther orthologue and paralogue predictions |
1 Downstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrIII_5240384..5240590 | 207 | III: 5240384-5240590 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
160 Expression Clusters
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts expressed in neuronal cells, by analyzingfluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) neurons. | DESeq. False discovry rate (FDR) < 0.1. | WBPaper00048988:neuron_expressed | |
| adult vs dauer larva | Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. | N.A. | WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C |
| Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. | DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. | WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched | |
| Maternal class (M): genes that are called present in at least one of the three PC6 replicates. | A modified Welch F statistic was used for ANOVA. For each gene, regressed error estimates were substituted for observed error estimates. The substitution is justified by the lack of consistency among the most and least variable genes at each time point. Regressed error estimates were abundance-dependent pooled error estimates that represented a median error estimate from a window of genes of similar abundance to the gene of interest. A randomization test was used to compute the probability Pg of the observed F statistic for gene g under the null hypothesis that developmental time had no effect on expression. P-values were not corrected for multiple testing. | [cgc5767]:expression_class_M | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sin-3(tm1276) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00061203:sin-3(tm1276)_upregulated | |
| Genes that showed significantly increased expression in daf-2(e1370);hel-1(gk148684) comparing to in hel-1(gk148684) | To identify DEGs, Students t test and the log2 median ratio test were performed to compute t values and median ratios for all the annotated genes. The adjusted P values from each test were computed using an empirical distribution of the null hypothesis, which was obtained from random permutations of the samples. Finally, the adjusted P values from the individual tests were combined to compute the overall P values using Stouffers method , and genes with overall P < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5 were selected as DEGs. | WBPaper00047131:daf-2(e1370)_upregulated_hel-1(gk148684)-background | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly changed expression in 6-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite animals. | Sleuth | WBPaper00051558:aging_regulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in sin-3(tm1276) comparing to in N2 at early embryo when there were only 3 -5 eggs in the adult. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, adjusted p-value < 0.01 | WBPaper00058598:sin-3(tm1276)_downregulated | |
| 25C vs. 20C | Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 25C, comparing to in N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:25C_vs_20C_upregulated |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 20C, comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:Day10_vs_Day1_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite npr-8(ok1439) animals grown at 20C, comparing to in N2 animals. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:npr-8(ok1439)_downregulated_Day10_20C | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in oocyte germline cells comparing to in mitosis germline cells. | Log2 Fold change > 2 or <-1, p-value < 0.05. | WBPaper00053599:oocyte_vs_mitosis_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in tetraploid N2 comparing to diploid N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2 R package (1.20.0), fold change > 2, and FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066110:tetraploid_vs_diploid_downregulated | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in hda-1(ne4752[3xFLAG-Degron-HDA-1]) in gonads dissected from 1-day old adult animals. | Salmon was used to map the mRNA-seq reads with the worm database WS268, and its output files were imported to DESeq2 in R. The differentially expressed genes were filtered by fold change more than 2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05. The scatter plots were generated by the plot function in R. | WBPaper00061479:hda-1(ne4752)_upregulated | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:glr-1(+)-neurons_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in srbc-48(ac23);kyIs262;fer-1(b232ts) comparing to in kyIs262;fer-1(b232ts), 24h after infection with P.aeruginosa. | DESeq2, FDR <0.05, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00059664:srbc-48(ac23)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in set-2(tm1630) animals at embryo stage, comparing to in N2 animals. | DESeq2 (v2.1.8.3) was used to determine DE genes and to generate principal component and scatter plots. DE genes with FDR < 0.05 were analysed using g:Profiler with Bonferroni correction. | WBPaper00060014:set-2(tm1630)_downregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals lacking P granules by RNAi experiments targeting pgl-1, pgl-3, glh-1 and glh-4, and unc-119-GFP(+), comparing to in control animals, at 2-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite stage. | DESeq2, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple hypothesis corrected p-value < 0.05 and fold change > 2. | WBPaper00050859:upregulated_P-granule(-)GFP(+)_vs_control_day2-adult | |
| Genes with significantly increased expression in eat-2(ad465) treated with 2% DMSO for 72 hours, comparing to in N2 treated with 2% DMSO for 72 hours. | Analysis of gene expression data was carried out with the Affymetrix Transcriptome Analysis Console. Data preprocessing (using RMA normalization) and QC metrics were performed using Affymetrix Expression Console TM and manually inspected afterwards. Expression analysis was carried out for each two pairwise conditions. FDR statistical correction for multiple testing resulted in a slightly lower number of DEGs in most cases. P-value < 0.05 and fold change > 2.0 were used to determine differentially expressed genes. | WBPaper00048989:eat-2(ad465)_upregulated_in-DMSO | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:hypodermis_L1-larva_expressed | |
| TGF- Dauer pathway adult transcriptional targets. Results obtained by comparing the microarray results of the dauer-constitutive mutants daf-7(e1372), daf-7(m62), and daf-1(m40) with dauer-defective mutants daf-3(mgDf90), daf-5(e1386), and daf-7(e1372);daf-3(mgDf90) double mutants at the permissive temperature, 20C, on the first day of adulthood. | SAM | WBPaper00031040:TGF-beta_adult_downregulated | |
| Genes expressed in N2. | Expressed transcripts were identified on the basis of a Present call in 3 out of 4 N2 experiments as determined by Affymetrix MAS 5.0. | WBPaper00025141:N2_Expressed_Genes | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals fed with JM103 bacteria producing Cry5B, comparing to control animals fed with JM103. | ANOVA, p-value < 0.05. | WBPaper00056167:Cry5B_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in spr-1(ok2144) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00061203:spr-1(ok2144)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sma-2(rax5) comparing to in N2 at 1-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite | HTseq-count was used to count reads mapped to each gene and counting data was imported to EdgeR for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was defined by adjusted P value (false discovery rate, FDR) of <0.05. | WBPaper00053184:sma-2(rax5)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sma-4(rax3) comparing to in N2 at 1-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite | HTseq-count was used to count reads mapped to each gene and counting data was imported to EdgeR for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was defined by adjusted P value (false discovery rate, FDR) of <0.05. | WBPaper00053184:sma-4(rax3)_upregulated | |
| Genes with significant decrease of expression in NBAS smgl-1(RNAi) comparing to control. | Bioconductor package LIMMA was used to determine differentially expressed genes. The P-values were adjusted for multiple testing with a false-discovery rate (50). Probe sets with fold-change > 1.5 and q-value < 0.05 were used as a cut-off for C. elegans microarrays | WBPaper00042561:smgl-1(RNAi)_downregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sams-3(RNAi) comparing to N2 animals injected with empty vector. | Deseq FDR < 0.01, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065005:sams-3(RNAi)_upregulated |
18 Expression Patterns
| Remark | Reporter Gene | Primary Identifier | Pattern | Subcellular Localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expr1030338 | Tiling arrays expression graphs | |||
| Expr8167 | Expressed in ABalaaxx, ABalpapax, ABalppapx, ABarappx, ABplaapax, ABplapax, ABplpaax, ABplppapx, ABpraapax, ABprapppx, ABprpaax, Abprppapx (97 neurons, 3 hypodermal cells, 1 arcade cell, 17 glia, 2 excretory system cells, 7 postembryonic blast cells). Onset time: 100 to 200 cells. Expressed in descendents of all 16 initial AB descendents with highly patterned expression: Onset time: 50 to 200 cells. | |||
| Expr15183 | We examined cnd-1p::mCherry expression in early L1 larvae, within an hour of hatching, counting nuclei in the retrovesicular ganglion and also the ventral nerve cord. The retrovesicular ganglion is a linear cluster of cells located on the ventral midline of the worm immediately posterior to the pharynx, and contains the anterior most DA, DB and DD motorneurons (DA1, DB1, DB2 and DD1), along with eight additional cells. Wild type animals showed an average of nine cnd-1p::mCherry nuclei in the retrovesicular ganglion and 10 in theventral nerve cord (n = 26). As there are 22 motorneurons in early L1 larvae, this suggests that only a subset express the cnd-1 reporter gene. Based on their location along the ventral nerve cord, co-labeling with unc-25p::GFP (a known DD neuron marker), and by corroborating against single cell RNA-seq expression data (Packer et al. 2019), we tentatively conclude that cnd-1p::mCherry is expressed in DA1-5, DB1, DB3, and DD1-6. | |||
| Expr10479 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10480 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10481 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10482 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10258 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10259 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10261 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10260 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10262 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Transgenic lines containing pCZ178 rescued both the uncoordination and cellular defects of the ventral cord motor neurons of cnd-1(ju29) mutants. To minimize misrepresentation caused by the mosaicism of the extrachromosomal arrays, authors collected data from three independent transgenic lines containing pCZ179 or pCZ178 respectively. | Expr954 | pCZ178 and pCZ179 were expressed in similar sets of cells, however, GFP expression from pCZ178 was much weaker than from pCZ179 in most cells. CND-1::GFP expression was first detectable in four descendants of the AB lineage of 14 cell embryos. AB derived neuroblasts give rise to most of the C. elegans nervous system. By the 24-cell stage, approximately 75 minutes postfertilization, CND-1::GFP was found in 15 AB derived blastomeres. CND-1::GFP expression was observed in numerous unidentified nuclei throughout gastrulation and epidermal enclosure. By early comma stage, approximately 360 minutes postfertilization, CND-1::GFP was found in many postmitotic neurons in the head and in the ventral cord. The expression of CND-1::GFP in the ventral cord neurons was maintained until hatching, but disappeared completely by the end of the first larval stage. CND-1::GFP was not observed in postembryonically derived motor neurons. To determine whether cnd-1 was expressed in non-neuronal cells of the AB lineage, embryos carrying cnd-1::GFP transgenes were double labeled with anti-GFP and anti-LIN-26 antibodies. In all embryonic stages examined the expression of CND-1::GFP and LIN-26 did not overlap. To confirm the identity of specific AB-derived blastomeres during later stage embryogenesis, embryos carrying CND-1::GFP transgenes were double labeled with anti-GFP and anti-UNC-86 antibodies. CND-1::GFP and UNC-86 are primarily expressed in different subsets of mitotic and postmitotic neurons throughout embryogenesis. At 230 minutes postfertilization, UNC-86 is expressed in ABplaaaaaa, ABarpapaaa, ABplapaaaa, ABprapaaaa, ABarppaaap, and ABarpppapp blastomeres (Finney and Ruvkun, 1990). At the same stage, CND-1::GFP was found in a non-overlapping set of neuroblasts derived from the ABplppap and ABprppap, including ABplppaap, ABplppapp, ABplpppaa, ABprppapa, ABprppaap, ABprppapp and ABprpppaa, which give rise to the embryonic ventral cord motor neurons. In summary, reporter transgene analysis reveals that CND-1::GFP is expressed in both mitotically active neuroblasts throughout embryogenesis, and in subsets of postmitotic neurons including the ventral cord motor neurons. | Transgenic lines containing pCZ178 show that GFP was localized to the nucleus. | |
| Expr2010270 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr1018881 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012 | |||
| Expr1145904 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015 | |||
| Expr1200146 | Data from the TransgeneOme project | |||
| Expr2028512 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). |
17 GO Annotation
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables |
18 Homologues
| Type |
|---|
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| least diverged orthologue |
| least diverged orthologue |
| least diverged orthologue |
| orthologue |
| least diverged orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| least diverged orthologue |
17 Ontology Annotations
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| enables |
2 Regulates Expr Cluster
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in cnd-1(ju29) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2 1.16.1 (R3.4.1) | WBPaper00059932:cnd-1(ju29)_downregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in cnd-1(ju29) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2 1.16.1 (R3.4.1) | WBPaper00059932:cnd-1(ju29)_upregulated |