WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00018914 Gene Name  F56A4.6
Sequence Name  ? F56A4.6 Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans
Automated Description  Is affected by several genes including rsr-2; glh-4; and glh-1 based on tiling array; microarray; and RNA-seq studies. Is affected by cadmium based on microarray studies. Biotype  SO:0000336
Genetic Position  Length (nt)  ? 5847
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00018914

Genomics

0 Transcripts

 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

18 Allele

Public Name
gk963301
gk963591
gk963553
gk964259
gk963850
gk963027
gk962689
gk962688
gk963769
WBVar01971654
WBVar01971655
h17992
WBVar01985932
tm8106
WBVar02043254
WBVar01807544
WBVar01807543
WBVar01896841

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
V Caenorhabditis elegans 20924180  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00018914 2440292 2446138 -1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrV_2439872..2440291   420 V: 2439872-2440291 Caenorhabditis elegans

12 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript
  Coexpression clique No. 60, 176662_at-Y53F4B.16, on the genome-wide coexpression clique map for the nematode GPL200 platform. All available microarray datasets for the GPL200 platform (Affymetrix C. elegans Genome Array) were obtained from the GEO repository. This included 2243 individual microarray experiments. These were normalized against each other with the software RMAexpress (Bolstad, 2014). Based on these normalized values, Pearsons correlation coefficients were obtained for each probe-probe pair of the 22,620 probes represented on this array type. The resulting list of correlation coefficients was then ranked to generate the ranked coexpression database with information on each probe represented on the GPL200 platform. WBPaper00061527:176662_at-Y53F4B.16
  Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) and age at L3 larva and Late reproduction stage (96 hours at 24 centigrade). For model 2, authors used 100 permutations to estimate the FDR threshold. Per permutation, genotypes and ages were independently randomly distributed, keeping the among-gene structure intact. Then for each spot (23,232) on the array, model 2 was tested. The obtained P-values were used to estimate a threshold for each of the explanatory factors. Authors also used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P-value = 2, which resembles an FDR of 0.072 and 0.060 for marker and the interaction age-marker for the developing worms and FDR of 0.050 and 0.065 for marker and age-marker for the aging worms. For the physiological age effect, authors used a log10 P-value = 8 in developing worms (0.012 FDR) and -log10 P-value = 6 (0.032 FDR). WBPaper00040858:eQTL_age_regulated_developing
  Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) at L3 larva and Late reproduction stage (96 hours at 24 centigrade). For model 2, authors used 100 permutations to estimate the FDR threshold. Per permutation, genotypes and ages were independently randomly distributed, keeping the among-gene structure intact. Then for each spot (23,232) on the array, model 2 was tested. The obtained P-values were used to estimate a threshold for each of the explanatory factors. Authors also used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P-value = 2, which resembles an FDR of 0.072 and 0.060 for marker and the interaction age-marker for the developing worms and FDR of 0.050 and 0.065 for marker and age-marker for the aging worms. For the physiological age effect, authors used a log10 P-value = 8 in developing worms (0.012 FDR) and -log10 P-value = 6 (0.032 FDR). WBPaper00040858:eQTL_regulated_developing
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals lacking P granules by RNAi experiments targeting pgl-1, pgl-3, glh-1 and glh-4, and unc-119-GFP(+), comparing to in control animals, at 2-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite stage. DESeq2, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple hypothesis corrected p-value < 0.05 and fold change > 2. WBPaper00050859:upregulated_P-granule(-)GFP(+)_vs_control_day2-adult
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals lacking P granules by RNAi experiments targeting pgl-1, pgl-3, glh-1 and glh-4, and unc-119-GFP(-), comparing to in control animals, at 2-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite stage. DESeq2, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple hypothesis corrected p-value < 0.05 and fold change > 2. WBPaper00050859:upregulated_P-granule(-)GFP(-)_vs_control_day2-adult
  Genes that showed significant differential expressed between control and 20 mg\/L Cadmium treatment. t-test, p < 0.05. WBPaper00036123:Cadmium_regulated
  Genes up regulated by mir-243(n4759). RNAs that changed at least 2-fold with a probability of p > 0.05 in three biological replicates were considered differentially regulated between wild-type and mir-243. WBPaper00036130:mir-243_up_regulated
  Genome-wide analysis of developmental and sex-regulated gene expression profile. self-organizing map cgc4489_group_17
  Genes that showed significantly decreased expression level in rsr-2(RNAi) animals comparing to in gfp(RNAi) control. Fold change > 1.2 or < 0.8. WBPaper00042477:rsr-2(RNAi)_downregulated_TilingArray
  Genes that showed decreased expression in bar-1(ga80) animal comparing to in N2. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical programming language R (version 2.13.1 x 64). A linear model was used to determine the effect and significance of the genotype on the expression levels (probe intensity + genotype + error). Using permutations of the original data in the same linear model, authors determined thresholds adjusted for multiple testing (FDR 0.05: -log10(p) > 2; FDR 0.01: -log10(p) > 3). To correct for the developmental difference between bar-1(ga80) and N2 authors used the developmental gene expression data from Snoek et al. (2014) together with the gene expression data generated for this study (bar-1(ga80) vs. N2) in one linear model (probe intensity, sample age + genotype + error). The intensities were corrected for batch effect and for sample age authors used an age of 44 hours for the bar-1(ga80) samples (as estimated), and 48 hours for the N2 samples. WBPaper00045257:bar-1(ga80)_downregulated
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in adr-2(ok735) and adr-2(gv42) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq FDR <= 0.05 WBPaper00056617:adr-2_upregulated_L4_transcript

2 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr1152380 Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015  
    Expr1027508 Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012  

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00018914 2440292 2446138 -1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
5847

1 Sequence Ontology Term