Genomics
1 Transcripts
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcript:C38D4.3.1 | C38D4.3.1 |
5463
 |
III: 4786080-4792391 |
Other
1 CDSs
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDS:C38D4.3 | C38D4.3 |
5355
|
III: 4786081-4786171 |
38 RNAi Result
71 Allele
| Public Name |
|---|
| t1578 |
| t1684 |
| WBVar01825489 |
| WBVar00052346 |
| WBVar01903721 |
| gk473637 |
| WBVar02034194 |
| WBVar00269726 |
| WBVar01644287 |
| WBVar00602628 |
| gk955022 |
| WBVar01893297 |
| WBVar01644286 |
| gk173432 |
| gk173431 |
| gk173434 |
| gk173433 |
| gk173428 |
| gk173430 |
| gk173429 |
| gk173440 |
| gk173439 |
| tm2434 |
| gk173441 |
| gk173436 |
| gk173435 |
| gk173438 |
| gk173437 |
| WBVar01445461 |
| WBVar01445459 |
1 Chromosome Location
|
Feature . Primary Identifier |
Start | End | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBGene00003210 | 4786080 | 4792391 | 1 |
3 Data Sets
| Name | URL |
|---|---|
| WormBaseAcedbConverter | |
| GO Annotation data set | |
| C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene) |
1 Downstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrIII_4792392..4793085 | 694 | III: 4792392-4793085 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
167 Expression Clusters
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts of coding genes that showed significantly decreased expression in muscle. | DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. | WBPaper00062325:muscle_depleted_coding-RNA | |
| Transcripts expressed in neuronal cells, by analyzingfluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) neurons. | DESeq. False discovry rate (FDR) < 0.1. | WBPaper00048988:neuron_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:all-neurons_L1-larva_expressed | |
| adult vs dauer larva | Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. | N.A. | WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C |
| mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. | Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. | WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:AVE-neuron_L1-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:bodywall-muscle_L1-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that were upregulated in lin-15B(n744). | For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis. | WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression after animals were treated with 100uM Rapamycin and 50mM Metformin from day 1 to day 3 adult hermaphradite. | DESeq2(v1.14.1), fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05 | WBPaper00055354:Rapamycin-Metformin_upregulated | |
| Proteins interacting with NHR-49-GFP according to co-IP and LC-MS. | N.A. | WBPaper00064071:NHR-49_interacting | |
| Transcripts expressed in hypodermis, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pdpy-7-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:hypodermis_expressed | |
| Transcripts expressed in intestine, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pges-1-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:intestine_expressed | |
| Transcripts expressed in NMDA neuron, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pnmr-1-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:NMDA-neuron_expressed | |
| Transcripts expressed in seam cells, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pgrd-10-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:seam_expressed | |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 10 mix) vs BT407 12h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.1mix_downregulated_12h |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 2 mix) vs BT407 6h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.5mix_downregulated_6h |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 2 mix) vs BT407 12h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.5mix_downregulated_12h |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in hsp-6(mg585) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. | EdgeR, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.001. | WBPaper00056290:hsp-6(mg585)_downregulated | |
| Maternal class (M): genes that are called present in at least one of the three PC6 replicates. | A modified Welch F statistic was used for ANOVA. For each gene, regressed error estimates were substituted for observed error estimates. The substitution is justified by the lack of consistency among the most and least variable genes at each time point. Regressed error estimates were abundance-dependent pooled error estimates that represented a median error estimate from a window of genes of similar abundance to the gene of interest. A randomization test was used to compute the probability Pg of the observed F statistic for gene g under the null hypothesis that developmental time had no effect on expression. P-values were not corrected for multiple testing. | [cgc5767]:expression_class_M | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals exposed to 400uM tamoxifen from L1 to L4 larva stage. | DEseq2, fold change > 2 | WBPaper00064505:tamoxifen_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly changed expression in 6-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite animals. | Sleuth | WBPaper00051558:aging_regulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly altered expression after 24 hour exposure to stavudine (d4T) starting at L1 lava stage. | DESeq | WBPaper00053302:stavudine_24h_regulated | |
| Genes down regulated by mir-243(n4759). | RNAs that changed at least 2-fold with a probability of p > 0.05 in three biological replicates were considered differentially regulated between wild-type and mir-243. | WBPaper00036130:mir-243_down_regulated | |
| 25C vs. 20C | Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 25C, comparing to in N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:25C_vs_20C_upregulated |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 20C, comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:Day10_vs_Day1_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in tetraploid N2 comparing to diploid N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2 R package (1.20.0), fold change > 2, and FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066110:tetraploid_vs_diploid_downregulated | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:GABAergic-motor-neurons_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed altered expression in cat-1(RNAi) animals comparing to control animals injected with empty vector. | p-value <= 0.05 | WBPaper00066902:cat-1(RNAi)_regulated |
16 Expression Patterns
| Remark | Reporter Gene | Primary Identifier | Pattern | Subcellular Localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visualization of GFP::MEL-28 in living embryos and immunofluorescence labeling show the same localization patterns, which are abolished in mel-28(RNAi) animals. | Expr4321 | MEL-28 shuttles dynamically between the nuclear periphery and the kinetochore during the cell cycles of early embryogenesis. During meiosis, MEL-28 is present on the nuclear periphery in the oocyte, on the condensing oocyte chromosomes, and on meiotic chromosomes (polar bodies) in the fertilized embryo. During interphase of the first mitotic cycle, MEL-28 is present at the nuclear periphery and as puncta within the nucleus. On the nuclear periphery, MEL-28 localization overlaps with the interior rim of nuclear-envelope marker mAB414 (which in C. elegans recognizes primarily nucleoporins NPP-9 [Nup358] and NPP-10 [Nup98/96]. As the pronuclei meet, each nucleus shows a dynamic reorganization of the internal puncta. By metaphase, the scattered dots resolve into pairs of stripes on either side of the metaphase plate, a pattern indicative of holocentric kinetochore localization. | ||
| Expr4322 | MEL-28 was expressed in embryos as well as in all larval stages and in adults. Immunolocalization of MEL-28 in several tissues revealed a nuclear-rim localization typical for NE or NPC proteins. MEL-28 was localized to chromatin during mitosis. The localization of MEL-28 within the NE was then analyzed by immuno-gold TEM. As expected, the highest density of gold particles was observed at the NE, but particles were also observed in the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm. Particles found in the cytoplasm most likely reflect a cross reactivity of the MEL-28 antibody because a similar density of gold particles was observed in the cytoplasm of mel-28(t1684) embryos. No gold particles were observed in the nuclei or at the nuclear periphery of mutant embryos. Of the particles associated with the NE in the wild-types, 95.0% (152/160) were found at NPCs. No accumulation at the outer nuclear membrane was detected. MEL-28 enrichment at NPCs was also detected in gonad nuclei. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that MEL-28 began to localize to the condensing chromosomes before complete disappearance of mAb414 staining from the nuclear rim at prophase and began to appear as two lines parallel to the metaphase plate. During late anaphase, MEL-28 signal colocalized with the decondensing chromosomes, and the mAb414 signal reaccumulated to the reforming NE during telophase. Immunolocalization of MEL-28 in embryos expressing GFP-HIM-10 revealed an overlapping localization of both proteins parallel to the metaphase plate within the mitotic spindle. Only a few kinetochore microtubules remained visible after 30 s on ice, and after 60 s, microtubules were not detectable. At both time points, MEL-28 staining remained clearly visible along the condensed and aligned chromosomes, indicating that MEL-28 localizes to kinetochores during mitosis. MEL-28 localization changes rapidly at late anaphase and telophase. MEL-28 initially spreads over the entire chromatin surface then rapidly relocalizes to the NE. This distribution would be consistent with MEL-28's playing a role in the interactions that occur between chromatin and the assembling NE and NPCs late in mitosis. | |||
| Expr4323 | To investigate the dynamics of MEL-28 in living embryos, GFP-MEL-28 was compared with known NE proteins fused to G/YFP using confocal time-lapse microscopy. Like endogenous MEL-28, which was localized by immunostaining, GFP-MEL-28 was mostly concentrated at the nuclear periphery but was also detected in the nucleoplasm and associated with condensing chromosomes when cells entered mitosis. This pattern was indistinguishable from that of YFP-Nup107, which also localizes to kinetochores and is recruited very early during NE assembly. Consistent with previous reports, GFP-Nup155 associated with the NE approximately 60 s after anaphase onset when the integral NE protein LEM-2 began to concentrate around chromosomes. Thus, MEL-28 is present on chromatin before NE reassembly and earlier than most other NE components. | |||
| Expr1031516 | Tiling arrays expression graphs | |||
| Expr2013518 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr10361 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr14727 | GFP fusions of five tested Y-complex subunits (npp-2, npp-6, mel-28, and npp-18) revealed localization to the cup-like kinetochores and linear elements; for one of them, MEL-28, we confirmed co-localization with the outer kinetochore component KNL-1. All of the tested GFP fusions also localized to the periphery of interphase nuclei and to mitotic kinetochores in embryos. | |||
| Expr1146155 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015 | |||
| Expr12964 | Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, the authors generated a GFP knock-in mel-28 allele to analyze the expression of endogenous MEL-28 by live microscopy. Similar to the observations with antibodies against MEL-28, GFP::MEL-28 localized to the nuclear envelope (NE) in all cell types during embryonic and larval development and in adults. Thus, they conclude that MEL-28 is ubiquitously expressed throughout C. elegans development. MEL-28 strongly accumulated on condensed oocyte chromosomes. In the -4 oocyte, MEL-28 localized to the NE and was absent from condensed chromosomes. In the -3 and -2 oocytes MEL-28 gradually moved away from the NE and accumulated uniformly on meiotic chromosomes. Later, in the -1 oocyte MEL-28 redistributed to cover the surface of meiotic chromosomes, in some cases completely enclosing the chromosomes and in other cases similar to the 'cup-shaped' localization of kinetochore proteins, such as KNL-1 and KNL-3. The association of MEL-28 with chromosomes persisted throughout meiosis I and II until pronuclear formation ~30 minutes after germinal vesicle breakdown. During interphase full- length MEL-28 was mainly localized to the NE but was also found in the nucleoplasm. In prophase and prometaphase, MEL-28 left the NE before complete NE breakdown and associated to the condensing chromosomes. By metaphase, MEL-28 appeared as two lines parallel to the metaphase plate, resembling the characteristic pattern of holocentric kinetochore proteins, and less abundantly to the area of the mitotic spindle. During anaphase, MEL-28 associated to decondensing chromosomes, and re-localized to reforming NE in telophase. | |||
| Expr14734 | GFP fusions of five tested Y-complex subunits (npp-2, npp-6, mel-28, and npp-18) revealed localization to the cup-like kinetochores and linear elements; for one of them, MEL-28, we confirmed co-localization with the outer kinetochore component KNL-1. All of the tested GFP fusions also localized to the periphery of interphase nuclei and to mitotic kinetochores in embryos. | |||
| Expr2031752 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr14735 | GFP fusions of five tested Y-complex subunits (npp-2, npp-6, mel-28, and npp-18) revealed localization to the cup-like kinetochores and linear elements; for one of them, MEL-28, we confirmed co-localization with the outer kinetochore component KNL-1. All of the tested GFP fusions also localized to the periphery of interphase nuclei and to mitotic kinetochores in embryos. | |||
| Expr14740 | MEL-28 was detected on chromosomes throughout anaphase. | |||
| Expr14741 | A functional GFP::MEL-28 fusion co-localizes with outer kinetochore components, such as KNL-1, during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I | |||
| Expr1010769 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012 | |||
| Expr3666 | Shuttles between nuclear periphery during interphase onto chromosomes during mitosis (double line at metaphase suggests kinetochore localization). |
24 GO Annotation
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0000093) | located_in |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0000090)|existence_overlaps(GO:0000088)|existence_overlaps(GO:0000089) | located_in |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0051329) | part_of |
| part_of | |
| part_of | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0051329) | located_in |
| located_in | |
| enables |
24 Ontology Annotations
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0000093) | located_in |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0000090)|existence_overlaps(GO:0000088)|existence_overlaps(GO:0000089) | located_in |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0051329) | part_of |
| part_of | |
| part_of | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| existence_overlaps(GO:0051329) | located_in |
| located_in | |
| enables |
1 Upstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrIII_4785236..4786079 | 844 | III: 4785236-4786079 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
