|
|
Coexpression clique No. 203, sre-33-ZK1025.1_8337, on the genome-wide coexpression clique map for the nematode GPL200 platform. |
All available microarray datasets for the GPL200 platform (Affymetrix C. elegans Genome Array) were obtained from the GEO repository. This included 2243 individual microarray experiments. These were normalized against each other with the software RMAexpress (Bolstad, 2014). Based on these normalized values, Pearsons correlation coefficients were obtained for each probe-probe pair of the 22,620 probes represented on this array type. The resulting list of correlation coefficients was then ranked to generate the ranked coexpression database with information on each probe represented on the GPL200 platform. |
WBPaper00061527:sre-33-ZK1025.1_8337
|
|
|
Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) and age at L3 larva and Late reproduction stage (96 hours at 24 centigrade). |
For model 2, authors used 100 permutations to estimate the FDR threshold. Per permutation, genotypes and ages were independently randomly distributed, keeping the among-gene structure intact. Then for each spot (23,232) on the array, model 2 was tested. The obtained P-values were used to estimate a threshold for each of the explanatory factors. Authors also used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P-value = 2, which resembles an FDR of 0.072 and 0.060 for marker and the interaction age-marker for the developing worms and FDR of 0.050 and 0.065 for marker and age-marker for the aging worms. For the physiological age effect, authors used a log10 P-value = 8 in developing worms (0.012 FDR) and -log10 P-value = 6 (0.032 FDR). |
WBPaper00040858:eQTL_age_regulated_developing
|
|
Heat shock: 34C 30min. |
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in L2 larva stage C. elegans animals after incubated in a 34C water bath for 30min. |
DESeq2 v 1.18.1, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00058955:heatshock_upregulated_CE
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:bodywall-muscle_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under UVC exposure and EtBr treatment vs under EtBr treatment but without UVC exposure at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
|
Genes upregulated in daf-2(-) compared to daf-16(-); daf-2(-) |
Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) was performed to identify genes that were differentially regulated in each of the comparisons.For DAF-16 regulated genes, 1% median false positive discovery rate was used. |
WBPaper00035479:daf-16(RNAi)_downregulated
|
|
Bacteria infection: Photorhabdus luminescens |
Genes with increased expression after 24 hours of infection by P.lumniescens Fold changes shown are pathogen vs OP50. |
For RNA-seq and tiling arrays, log2 fold changes between gene expression values of infected versus uninfected nematodes were calculated. For log2 fold changes > 0.00001 the values > 81.25th percentile were defined as up-regulated and for log2 fold changes < -0.00001 the values < 18.75th percentile were defined as down-regulated. |
WBPaper00038438:P.lumniescens_24hr_upregulated_TilingArray
|
|
|
Genes predicted to be downregulated more than 2.0 fold in eri-1(mg366) mutant worms as compared to wild-type animals (t-test P-value < 0.05). |
A t-test (5% confidence) was applied to the triplicate sample data for each transcript in each mutant to identify genes significantly elevated or decreased compared with the wild type. |
WBPaper00027111:eri-1(mg366)_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed significantly increased expression after exposure to adsorbable organic bromine compounds (AOBr) contained in M. aeruginosa batch culture. |
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified with a random variance t-test and a significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) test. Genes were considered statistically significant if their p-value was less than 0.05, the false discovery rate less than 0.3, and the fold change compared to control at least <= 0.67 or >=1.5. |
WBPaper00046853:AOBr_M.aeruginosa-batch-culture_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes predicted to be downregulated more than 2.0 fold in rrf-2(ok210) mutant worms as compared to wild-type animals (t-test P-value < 0.05). |
A t-test (5% confidence) was applied to the triplicate sample data for each transcript in each mutant to identify genes significantly elevated or decreased compared with the wild type. |
WBPaper00027111:rrf-2(ok210)_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed higher expression level in ASER than in ASEL neuron by mRNA tagging. |
Intensities of spot features annotated as Bad or Not Found in the .gpr files were set to 1 to be removed from further analysis, and all of the six processed .gpr data were converted to .mev file with TIGR ExpressConverter ver. 1.7. The .mev files were processed with TIGR MIDAS ver. 2.19 with parameters set as follows: one bad channel tolerance policy as generous, with both of channel flag checked and background unchecked. The data were normalized by lowess normalization with default settings and with block and slide SD regularization. Authors then calculated log2(ASER/ASEL) ratios for each gene on the microarray. For the two pairs of dye-swapped repeats, authors calculated the mean log2(ASER/ASEL) of each repeat, so that up to four log2(ASER/ASEL) values per spot were obtained. Authors then calculated the percentile rank for each gene. Each gene spot detected more than once (18 847 spots) were subjected to MannWhitneys U test to assess whether its percentile rank values are significantly higher compared to the rest of the genes detected in the same experiments. Resulting significance levels are shown by P-values. From the P-values, false discovery rate (FDR) was further calculated by the Benjamini and Hochberg method. Statistical analyses were done by using R software version 2.9. |
WBPaper00035424:ASER_up
|
|
|
Class B gene expression showed up regulation in lin-14(lf) in L1, no change in lin-4(lf) in L2. |
Raw data from each experiment were downloaded from the Stanford Microarray Database into Excel files and processed as follows: (i) sort by Spot Flag and discard any rows where the Spot Flag value was nonzero, indicating a bad PCR; (ii) sort by Failed and discard any rows where the Failed value was nonzero, indicating abnormal hybridization; (iii) import into a common file for each type of experiment (i.e., lin-14 or lin-4) the columns from each raw experimental file [RAT2(R/G), which shows a log base 2 transformed ratio of normalized red/green signal for each spot; name of spot (Wormbase designation); chromosome location and description (www.wormbase.org)]; (iv) calculate an average RAT2(R/G) based on the 2 or 3 values (avg; any rows which had only one good experimental value were discarded); (v) calculate a standard deviation (stdev) for the average value; (vi) calculate a t value for each spot by using the formula t = avg*[sqrt(n - 1)]/stdev, where n is the number of experiments for which good data exist, sqrt is square root, and stdev is standard deviation; (vii) sort by absolute t value and discard any rows with a t value below 4.303 (below 95% confidence interval for three experiments) or below 12.706 (below 95% confidence interval for two experiments); (viii) sort by absolute average value and discard any rows with average values below 1.0 (less than twofold change compared to control). |
WBPaper00026952:class_B
|
