|
|
Transcripts expressed in neuronal cells, by analyzingfluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) neurons. |
DESeq. False discovry rate (FDR) < 0.1. |
WBPaper00048988:neuron_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:AVE-neuron_L1-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts expressed in intestine, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pges-1-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. |
Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. |
WBPaper00050990:intestine_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts expressed in NMDA neuron, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pnmr-1-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. |
Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. |
WBPaper00050990:NMDA-neuron_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in day 3 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in L4 larva daf-16(mu86);glp-1(e2141) animals. |
Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05 |
WBPaper00064088:Day-3-adult_vs_L4_downregulated_daf-16(mu86);glp-1(e2141)
|
|
Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis |
mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 2 mix) vs BT407 12h), according to RNAseq. |
Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. |
WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.5mix_downregulated_12h
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly changed expression in 6-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite animals. |
Sleuth |
WBPaper00051558:aging_regulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in dissected female germline comparing to in dissected male germline. |
Log2 Fold change > 2 or <-1, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00053599:female_vs_male_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in oocyte germline cells comparing to in mitosis germline cells. |
Log2 Fold change > 2 or <-1, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00053599:oocyte_vs_mitosis_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts detected in body muscle nuclei according to a nuclear FACS-based strategy. |
Cufflinks |
WBPaper00065120:body-muscle-transcriptome
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in xrep-4(lax137). |
DESeq2. Genes were selected if their p value < 0.01. |
WBPaper00066062:xrep-4(lax137)_upregulated
|
|
Temprature shift to 28C for 24 hours. |
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 28C temperature for 24 hours. |
Differentially expressed genes wereidentified using DESeq (v.1.18.0) by normalizing readsbased on the negative binomial distribution method andcomparing each HS timepoint to the 0-h control. |
WBPaper00061341:28C_24h_downregulated
|
|
Temprature shift to 28C for 48 hours. |
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 28C temperature for 48 hours. |
Differentially expressed genes wereidentified using DESeq (v.1.18.0) by normalizing readsbased on the negative binomial distribution method andcomparing each HS timepoint to the 0-h control. |
WBPaper00061341:28C_48h_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in isp-1(qm150) comparing to in N2. |
Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the quasi-likeli-hood framework in edgeR package v. 3.20.1 in R v. 3.4.1. |
WBPaper00053810:isp-1(qm150)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in nuo-6(qm200) comparing to in N2. |
Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the quasi-likeli-hood framework in edgeR package v. 3.20.1 in R v. 3.4.1. |
WBPaper00053810:nuo-6(qm200)_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:dopaminergic-neurons_L3-L4-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:excretory-cell_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 0hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:germline-precursors_blastula-embryo_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:hypodermis_L3-L4-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:intestine_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:PVD-OLL-neurons_L3-L4-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts detected in germline isolated from day-1 adult hermaphrodite animals. |
All three experiments have CPM >= 1. |
WBPaper00067147:germline_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that were not enriched in either spermatogenic fem-3(q96gf) nor oogenic fog-2(q71) gonads, according to RNAseq analysis. |
To identify differentially expressed transcripts, authors used R/Bioconductor package DESeq. |
WBPaper00045521:Gender_Neutral
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:bodywall-muscle_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in hsf-1(RNAi) animals comparing to in control animals, without heat shock. |
Transcripts that were differentially expressed in different conditions, compared to the hsf-1(+);-HS control, were determined with CuffDiff, which uses the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing to obtain the q-value (the FDR-adjusted the p-value). |
WBPaper00049942:hsf-1(RNAi)_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (Young adult all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:CEP-sheath-cells_Day1-adult_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts with significantly increased expression in isp-1(qm150) vs. N2, and in isp-1(qm150) ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162). |
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. |
WBPaper00045263:isp-1(qm150)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts with significantly increased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162). |
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. |
WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed more than 1.5-fold decrease of expression following (Pore-Forming Toxin) PFT treatment by Cry5B. |
Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) was used to determine a set differentially expressed genes. The cutoff p-value used was 0.01 with minimum 1.5 or 2 fold change. |
WBPaper00038231:Cry5B_1.5-fold_downregulated
|
|
Exposure to Au-NP. |
Genes with differeiential expression after exposed to Au-NP. |
Hierarchical clustering was performed in Partek to confirm that the samples match to the treatment groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to partition the variance due to treatment from technical and biological noise. The list of differentially expressed genes was generated by identifying the genes showing fold change of more than 1.5 and less than -1.5 at p < 0.05 with and without multiple sample correction, False Discovery Rate (FDR). False discovery correction according to Benjamini and Hochberg produced a list of 37 significant transcripts. FDR was not applied when selecting differential expressed genes, because this approach can increase the type II error and result in elimination of the genes responsive to the treatment. |
WBPaper00040821:Au-NP_regulated
|
