|
|
Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. |
DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched
|
|
|
Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) and age at old adults stage (214 hours at 24 centigrade). |
For model 2, authors used 100 permutations to estimate the FDR threshold. Per permutation, genotypes and ages were independently randomly distributed, keeping the among-gene structure intact. Then for each spot (23,232) on the array, model 2 was tested. The obtained P-values were used to estimate a threshold for each of the explanatory factors. Authors also used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P-value = 2, which resembles an FDR of 0.072 and 0.060 for marker and the interaction age-marker for the developing worms and FDR of 0.050 and 0.065 for marker and age-marker for the aging worms. For the physiological age effect, authors used a log10 P-value = 8 in developing worms (0.012 FDR) and -log10 P-value = 6 (0.032 FDR). |
WBPaper00040858:eQTL_age_regulated_aging
|
|
|
Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) at old adults stage (214 hours at 24 centigrade). |
For model 2, authors used 100 permutations to estimate the FDR threshold. Per permutation, genotypes and ages were independently randomly distributed, keeping the among-gene structure intact. Then for each spot (23,232) on the array, model 2 was tested. The obtained P-values were used to estimate a threshold for each of the explanatory factors. Authors also used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P-value = 2, which resembles an FDR of 0.072 and 0.060 for marker and the interaction age-marker for the developing worms and FDR of 0.050 and 0.065 for marker and age-marker for the aging worms. For the physiological age effect, authors used a log10 P-value = 8 in developing worms (0.012 FDR) and -log10 P-value = 6 (0.032 FDR). |
WBPaper00040858:eQTL_regulated_aging
|
|
|
Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) at Late reproduction stage (96 hours at 24 centigrade). |
Authors permuted transcript values and used a genome-wide threshold of log10 P-value = 2, which resembles a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.0118. |
WBPaper00040858:eQTL_regulated_reproductive
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in spt-16(RNAi) comparing to in vector control worm at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq 2, fold change > 4, adjusted p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00055013:spt-16(RNAi)_upregulated
|
|
Heat shock: 34C 30min. |
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in L2 larva stage C. elegans animals after incubated in a 34C water bath for 30min. |
DESeq2 v 1.18.1, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00058955:heatshock_upregulated_CE
|
|
|
Genes expressed in N2. |
Expressed transcripts were identified on the basis of a Present call in 3 out of 4 N2 experiments as determined by Affymetrix MAS 5.0. |
WBPaper00025141:N2_Expressed_Genes
|
|
|
Genes that are down-regulated in elt-2(ca15) larvae compared to elt-2(ca15);elt-7(tm840) larvae. |
RNA-seq count data were filtered for detected genes (> 10 counts across all samples) and analyzed using DESeq. 2 with Cook's cutoff filtering set to FALSE. Genes were counted as differentially expressed if they registered a Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-value less than 0.05 and a log2-fold change greater than 1.2 between any pair-wise conditional comparison. |
WBPaper00053606:elt-2(ca15)_vs_elt-2(ca15);elt-7(tm840)_doenregulated
|
|
|
Genes that are up-regulated in wild-type N2 larvae compared to elt-2(ca15) larvae. |
RNA-seq count data were filtered for detected genes (> 10 counts across all samples) and analyzed using DESeq. 2 with Cook's cutoff filtering set to FALSE. Genes were counted as differentially expressed if they registered a Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-value less than 0.05 and a log2-fold change greater than 1.2 between any pair-wise conditional comparison. |
WBPaper00053606:N2_vs_elt-2(ca15)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts with significantly increased expression in nuo-6(qm200) vs. N2, and in nuo-6(qm200);ced-4(n1162) vs. ced-4(n1162). |
Comparisons of each genotype were compared to the wild-type using the Empirical Base (Wright & Simon) algorithm and fold changes were represented on a log2 scale. A threshold of p < 0.05 and a fold change of 1.3 (log2) was set to determine differentially expressed targets. |
WBPaper00045263:nuo-6(qm200)_upregulated
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at just prior to the third UVC dose (48h). |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs under EtBr treatment without UVC exposure, at the -1h timepoint. |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_EtBr-exposed_48h
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs under EtBr treatment without UVC exposure, at the 3h timepoint. |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at just prior to the third UVC dose (48h). |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the -1h timepoint (just prior to the third UVC dose (48h)). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_48h
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the 3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at just prior to the third UVC dose (48h). |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -1h timepoint (just prior to the third UVC dose (48h)). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_48h
|
|
4 hours of starvation. |
Genes with significantly increased expression in N2 animals after 4 hours of starvation. |
Differentially expressed genes were determined by ANOVA analysis using the Partek software package. |
WBPaper00047070:N2_starvation_upregulated
|
|
feeding/starvation |
The second of four clusters of genes up-regulated during L1 arrest. |
For each average expression value, the larger of the model-based error and empirical error was reported. ANOVA and T-tests were also computed in Rosetta Resolver using the reported errors. Expression values, errors, and P-values corresponding to transcript detection, ANOVAs, and T-tests were exported from Rosetta Resolver and analyzed elsewhere. |
WBPaper00032948:StarveUp2
|
|
|
Larval Pan-neural Enriched Genes. |
A two-class unpaired analysis of the data was performed to identify genes that differ by >= 1.5-fold from the reference at a FDR of <1% for the larval pan-neural, embryonic pan-neural, and larval A-class motor neuron datasets. |
WBPaper00030839:Larval_Pan_Neuronal
|
|
|
Genes regulated by octr-1(ok371) after infected with P. aeruginosa PA14 for 4 hours at 25 centigrade. |
Microarray data were subjected to the robust multichip averaging algorithm using GeneSpring GX software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Analysis of variance t test and fold-change calculations were also performed using GeneSpring GX software. Probability calculations of enrichment were performed using the hypergeometric probability test (http://elegans.uky.edu/MA/progs/overlap_stats.html) to calculate the statistical significance of the overlap of gene groups. |
WBPaper00038304:octr-1_regulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that interact with endogenous EGL-43-GFP at L3 larva stage according to CHIP-Seq analysis. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00059471:EGL-43_interacting
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression after exposure of to 10 mg per liter of SiNPs for 24 h. |
Fold change and Welcht-test performed between probes per gene and were applied to selectdifferentially expressed genes (DEGs): the fold change threshold was 2-fold and the significance level was p < 0.05. |
WBPaper00057098:SiO2-nanoparticles_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes predicted to be upregulated more than 2.0 fold in (AFD+AWB) datasets as compared to unsorted whole embryonic cells dataset. |
Genes predicted to be regulated more than 2.0 fold. |
WBPaper00024671:AFD_AWB_vs_unsorted_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes predicted to be upregulated more than 2.0 fold in AFD dataset as compared to AWB dataset. |
Genes predicted to be regulated more than 2.0 fold. |
WBPaper00024671:AFD_vs_AWB_upregulated
|
