Genomics
1 Transcripts
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcript:F58B6.7 | F58B6.7 |
48
 |
III: 1101185-1101232 |
Other
8 Allele
| Public Name |
|---|
| gk963623 |
| gk962532 |
| gk964281 |
| WBVar02120666 |
| WBVar02124686 |
| gk166026 |
| gk424787 |
| gk460896 |
1 Chromosome Location
|
Feature . Primary Identifier |
Start | End | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBGene00198149 | 1101185 | 1101232 | 1 |
1 Downstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrIII_1101233..1103207 | 1975 | III: 1101233-1103207 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
2 Expression Clusters
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in eat-2(ad465) comparing to in N2. | Student's t-test, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05. | WBPaper00055386:eat-2(ad465)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in animals after 24 hour exposure to 100ug per ml silica nanoparticles (SiNPs). | The random variance model (RVM)t-test was applied toidentify differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAsbetween the SiNPs-treated group and the control group. P-value <0.05 and fold change (FC) >1.5 were considered as the threshold screening between the SiNP-treated groupand the control group. | WBPaper00060100:SiNP_downregulated_mRNA |