|
|
mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. |
Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. |
WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the 3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_51h
|
|
|
Genome-wide analysis of developmental and sex-regulated gene expression profile. |
self-organizing map |
cgc4489_group_9
|
|
|
Genes that showed significantly decreased expression level in rsr-2(RNAi) animals comparing to in gfp(RNAi) control. |
Fold change > 1.2 or < 0.8. |
WBPaper00042477:rsr-2(RNAi)_downregulated_TilingArray
|
|
|
Class B gene expression showed up regulation in lin-14(lf) in L1, no change in lin-4(lf) in L2. |
Raw data from each experiment were downloaded from the Stanford Microarray Database into Excel files and processed as follows: (i) sort by Spot Flag and discard any rows where the Spot Flag value was nonzero, indicating a bad PCR; (ii) sort by Failed and discard any rows where the Failed value was nonzero, indicating abnormal hybridization; (iii) import into a common file for each type of experiment (i.e., lin-14 or lin-4) the columns from each raw experimental file [RAT2(R/G), which shows a log base 2 transformed ratio of normalized red/green signal for each spot; name of spot (Wormbase designation); chromosome location and description (www.wormbase.org)]; (iv) calculate an average RAT2(R/G) based on the 2 or 3 values (avg; any rows which had only one good experimental value were discarded); (v) calculate a standard deviation (stdev) for the average value; (vi) calculate a t value for each spot by using the formula t = avg*[sqrt(n - 1)]/stdev, where n is the number of experiments for which good data exist, sqrt is square root, and stdev is standard deviation; (vii) sort by absolute t value and discard any rows with a t value below 4.303 (below 95% confidence interval for three experiments) or below 12.706 (below 95% confidence interval for two experiments); (viii) sort by absolute average value and discard any rows with average values below 1.0 (less than twofold change compared to control). |
WBPaper00026952:class_B
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed more than 4 fold of expression in CB4856 comparing to in N2 animals. |
DESeq2, fold change > 4. |
WBPaper00053909:N2_vs_CB4856_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in cnd-1(ju29) comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2 1.16.1 (R3.4.1) |
WBPaper00059932:cnd-1(ju29)_downregulated
|
