|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:all-neurons_L1-larva_expressed
|
|
adult vs dauer larva |
Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C
|
|
|
mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. |
Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. |
WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript
|
|
|
Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. |
DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:bodywall-muscle_L1-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ogt-1(ok1474) neuronal cells isolated by FACs comparing to in FACs isolated neuronal cells from wild type. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066485:ogt-1(ok1474)_upregulated_neuron
|
|
Bacteria infection: Enterococcus faecalis |
Genes with increased expression after 24 hours of infection by E.faecalis Fold changes shown are pathogen vs OP50. |
For RNA-seq and tiling arrays, log2 fold changes between gene expression values of infected versus uninfected nematodes were calculated. For log2 fold changes > 0.00001 the values > 81.25th percentile were defined as up-regulated and for log2 fold changes < -0.00001 the values < 18.75th percentile were defined as down-regulated. |
WBPaper00038438:E.faecalis_24hr_upregulated_TilingArray
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:all-neurons_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:excretory-cell_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:GABAergic-motor-neurons_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:glr-1(+)-neurons_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:intestine_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L1-larva_expressed
|
|
20C vs 25C |
Transcripts that showed differential expression in 20C vs 25C in mir-34(OverExpression) animals at adult stage. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00050488:20C_vs_25C_regulated_mir-34(OverExpression)_adult
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:bodywall-muscle_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:dopaminergic-neurons_L1-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed differential expression in dauer mir-34(gk437) vs dauer mir-34(OverExpression) animals at 20C. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00050488:mir-34(gk437)_vs_mir-34(OverExpression)_regulated_dauer_20C
|
|
|
Genes with expression level regulated by genotype (N2 vs CB4856) at L3 larva stage |
Authors permuted transcript values and used a genome-wide threshold of log10 P-value = 2, which resembles a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.0129. |
WBPaper00040858:eQTL_regulated_juvenile
|
|
|
Significantly upregulated genes from cyc-1(RNAi) microarrays using SAM algorithm with an FDR < 0.1 from adult-only chips. |
SAM algorithm with an FDR < 0.1. |
WBPaper00033065:cyc-1(RNAi)_upregulated
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at just prior to the second UVC dose (24h). |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -25h timepoint (just prior to the second UVC dose (24h)). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_24h
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed differential expression in dauer N2 vs dauer mir-34(gk437) animals at 20C. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00050488:N2_vs_mir-34(gk437)_regulated_dauer_20C
|
|
|
mRNAs that were significantly enriched in the AIN-1 immunoprecipitation samples, compared to the control total mRNAs in the input extracts (p < 0.01). |
Signals from replicates of total worm lysates from wt and strains containing the ain-2::gfp or the ain-2 promoter::gfp transgene were mean normalized and averaged respectively to generate standard profiles of gene expression in these worm strains. Authors then calculated the ratio of signal of each gene from each IP sample to the standard gene expression profile of the corresponding worm strain. Based on this ratio, a percentile rank of each gene relative to all genes in each IP replicate was calculated. The percentile ranks in the three replicates of each IP were averaged. Student t test was utilized to determine if the average percentile ranks of enrichment of individual genes were significantly higher (p value) than the mean enrichment of all genes in the IP samples. To determine the AIN-1 or AIN-2 associated genes, we used the following criteria: (1) average percentile ranks of enrichment is greater than the mean enrichment of all genes in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP with p < 0.01; (2) average signal in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP replicates is greater than the background signal (including 2X standard deviation (SD)) (Background signal and SD were calculated based on signals from empty spots on each microarray); (3) criteria 1 is not be satisfied for the same gene in the corresponding control IP. |
WBPaper00031252:AIN-1_IP_enriched
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in eat-2(ad465) comparing to in N2. |
Student's t-test, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00055386:eat-2(ad465)_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed significantly decreased expression level in rsr-2(RNAi) animals comparing to in gfp(RNAi) control. |
Fold change > 1.2 or < 0.8. |
WBPaper00042477:rsr-2(RNAi)_downregulated_TilingArray
|
|
|
Single-cell RNA-Seq cell group 117_0 expressed in neuron. |
scVI 0.6.0 |
WBPaper00065841:117_0
|
|
|
miRNA targets that are significantly enriched at L3 larva stage. To generate a global view of the dynamics of miRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression during C. elegans development, authors analyzed the mRNAs in the AIN-2-GFP IP results from five developmental stages. The magnitude of the combined interaction of miRNAs with a given target mRNA was assessed by measuring the fold enrichment of that mRNA in AIN-2 IP samples, relative to the abundance of the mRNA in the corresponding total lysate. Because this enrichment in the IP sample versus total lysate directly reflects the miRISC-associated fraction of a given mRNA, high enrichment indicates the likelihood of strong miRNA-mediated regulation of the mRNA, whereas low or negative enrichment indicates the likelihood of weak or absent miRNA regulation of the mRNA. It is also possible that poor enrichment could reflect interactions that occur only in a rare subset of cells at any given stage of development. Transcripts that were significantly enriched (0
|
For each transcript represented on the microarray, authors first used all 18 data points from all of the 18 microarrays to calculate its average in-stage standard deviation as SD=SQRT((i=1-K (ni-1)SDi2)/(N-K)), degree of freedom (df)=N-K, where K is the number of developmental stages in which the given transcript had at least one non-missing log2(IP/Total) value; ni is the number of non-missing values in stage i among the K stages; SDi is the standard deviation of the log2(IP/Total) values from all the replicates of stage i; N is the total number of non-missing values for this transcript at all stages. A transcript must have at least one stage with at least two non-missing values to be testable. All of the non-missing values of a transcript at each stage were averaged to generate the stage-average values (Mi for stage i). The standard error of Mi was calculated as SEi=SD/SQRT(ni) (df=N-K), where SD is the average in-stage standard deviation calculated above and ni is the number of non-missing values at stage i, as explained above. Based on the SEi, a one-tailed Students t-test was used to calculate the P-value of enrichment in stage i (Test if Mi>0). The T statistic was constructed as T=Mi/SEi (df=N-K). Mi>0 and enrichment P<0.001 were used as the threshold of enrichment for each stage. |
WBPaper00035084:L3_enriched_AIN-2_IP
|
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in natural variant RC301(that showed resistance towards bacteria infection) vs. natural variant DA650, after 4 hour of infection by P. aeruginosa PA14. |
Fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00050712:RC301_vs_DA650_4h-PA_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in dpy-21(e428) comparing to in N2 during L3 stage. |
DESeq v1.6.3. Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00050370:dpy-21(e428)_L3_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes with decreased expression level for L4 stage larvae in hpl-2; hpl-1 and his-24 hpl-1; hpl-2 compared to wild type (FDR < 0.05). |
The gene expression fold change was calculated from the duplicate microarray data. The fold change cut-off was 1.5 from 2 biological replicates (FDR < 0.05). Fold change shown here are hpl-1; hpl-2; his-24 vs WT. |
WBPaper00041609:hpl-1_hpl-2_downregulated
|
