|
adult vs dauer larva |
Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C
|
|
|
mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. |
Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. |
WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript
|
|
|
Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. |
DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ogt-1(ok1474) neuronal cells isolated by FACs comparing to in FACs isolated neuronal cells from wild type. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066485:ogt-1(ok1474)_upregulated_neuron
|
|
Bacteria: B.subtilis |
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression when animals were fed by probiotic bacteria strain B.subtilis PXN21 comparing to animals fed with OP50 from L1 till day 1 adult. |
edgeR 3.16.5, FDR < 0.05, fold change > 2. |
WBPaper00059117:B.subtilis_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:hypodermis_L3-L4-larva_expressed
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
|
|
|
Up-regulated genes (fold change > 1.5) in two CoQ-deficient clk-1 mutant strains (e2519, qm30) compared to wild types N2. |
Fold-changes of intensities were calculated from the arithmetic mean of gene expression values between experimental and corresponding control group. Fold change >= 1.5 was used as cut-off. |
WBPaper00045774:clk-1_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts down regulated in hpl-2(tm1489) embryo comparing to N2 in tiling array analysis. |
Oligos from the tiling array were mapped to chromosome coordinates of the exons from Wormbase WS180. Any oligo that mapped to a gene on both the Watson and Crick strands was excluded. The remaining oligos were then grouped together (perfect match and mismatch) into probe sets and written out into an Affymetrix CDF file. The CDF file was converted into an R-package and loaded into R. The expression values were calculated using the justRMA function from Bioconductor. This used a Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction. |
WBPaper00040560:hpl-2_embryo_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (Young adult all cell reference). |
A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. |
WBPaper00037950:CEP-sheath-cells_Day1-adult_expressed
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the 3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under UVC exposure and EtBr treatment vs under EtBr treatment but without UVC exposure at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_51h
|
|
25C vs. 20C |
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 25C, comparing to in N2 animals grown at 20C. |
CuffDiff, fold change > 2. |
WBPaper00065096:25C_vs_20C_downregulated
|
|
|
Genes that showed significantly decreased expression after exposure to 1mg/L MWCNTs from L1 larva to young adult. |
Transcripts with false discovery rate-corrected p-values < 0.05 and fold change > 2 were defined as differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00049377:MWCNT_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 20C, comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 animals grown at 20C. |
CuffDiff, fold change > 2. |
WBPaper00065096:Day10_vs_Day1_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in daf-2(e1370) comparing to in N2. |
Student's t-test, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00055386:daf-2(e1370)_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in pmt-2(RNAi) animals comparing to control animals iinjected with empty vector. |
Fold-change > 1.5, ANOVA P values < 0.05. |
WBPaper00055482:pmt-2(RNAi)_downregulated
|
|
|
Expression Pattern Group G, enriched for genes involved in locomotion. |
The significance (P 0.0001) of the relative age (time) was used to determine if a gene was differentially expressed between the three age (time) groups. The effect of this factor explaining gene expression differences was used to determine if the expression went up or down during the two age/time periods (t1 - t2 and t2 -t3). Authors used a permutation approach to determine the thresholds for the different mapping strategies. For each of the used models for eQTL mapping, authors used 23,000 permutations. For each permutation, authors randomly picked a spot; each spot could only be picked once. The gene expression and relative lifespan values were than randomly distributed over the RILs (and time points) and used for mapping. In this way, authors obtained a threshold for each of the explaining factors. For the single time points, authors used a FDR of 0.01 to adjust for multiple testing. The genome-wide threshold for this FDR is -log10 P = 3.8 for each of the three time points. For the combined models (t1 to t2 and t2 to t3), authors used a genome-wide threshold of -log10 P = 4, which resembles an FDR of 0.006, 0.001, and 0.006 for marker, age, and the interaction between marker and age, respectively. To determine the threshold for the single gene examples, authors used 1000 permutations as in the genome-wide threshold. The difference is that they use the gene under study in all of the permutations. The P-values for the gene specific thresholds were determined at FDR = 0.05. |
WBPaper00036286:Pattern_G
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in adr-1(tm668) comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, p-value < 0.05 and a fold enrichment log2fold > 0.5. |
WBPaper00055226:adr-1(tm668)_downregulated
|
|
|
Coexpression clique No. 282, srj-21-srh-32, on the genome-wide coexpression clique map for the nematode GPL200 platform. |
All available microarray datasets for the GPL200 platform (Affymetrix C. elegans Genome Array) were obtained from the GEO repository. This included 2243 individual microarray experiments. These were normalized against each other with the software RMAexpress (Bolstad, 2014). Based on these normalized values, Pearsons correlation coefficients were obtained for each probe-probe pair of the 22,620 probes represented on this array type. The resulting list of correlation coefficients was then ranked to generate the ranked coexpression database with information on each probe represented on the GPL200 platform. |
WBPaper00061527:srj-21-srh-32
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in hlh-26(ok1453) animals exposed to E. faecium for 8 hours, comparing to N2 animals exposed to E. faecium for 8 hours. |
Fold change > 2. |
WBPaper00062585:hlh-26(ok1453)_downregulated_E.faecium
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in nas-38(ok3407) comparing to in N2. |
A feature was classified upregulated if its FDR-corrected p-value was <= 0.05 and fold change was >= 2. Analogously, a gene was classified downregulated if its FDR-corrected p-value was <= 0.05 and fold change was <= -2. |
WBPaper00060703:nas-38(ok3407)_downregulated
|
|
|
Class B gene expression showed up regulation in lin-14(lf) in L1, no change in lin-4(lf) in L2. |
Raw data from each experiment were downloaded from the Stanford Microarray Database into Excel files and processed as follows: (i) sort by Spot Flag and discard any rows where the Spot Flag value was nonzero, indicating a bad PCR; (ii) sort by Failed and discard any rows where the Failed value was nonzero, indicating abnormal hybridization; (iii) import into a common file for each type of experiment (i.e., lin-14 or lin-4) the columns from each raw experimental file [RAT2(R/G), which shows a log base 2 transformed ratio of normalized red/green signal for each spot; name of spot (Wormbase designation); chromosome location and description (www.wormbase.org)]; (iv) calculate an average RAT2(R/G) based on the 2 or 3 values (avg; any rows which had only one good experimental value were discarded); (v) calculate a standard deviation (stdev) for the average value; (vi) calculate a t value for each spot by using the formula t = avg*[sqrt(n - 1)]/stdev, where n is the number of experiments for which good data exist, sqrt is square root, and stdev is standard deviation; (vii) sort by absolute t value and discard any rows with a t value below 4.303 (below 95% confidence interval for three experiments) or below 12.706 (below 95% confidence interval for two experiments); (viii) sort by absolute average value and discard any rows with average values below 1.0 (less than twofold change compared to control). |
WBPaper00026952:class_B
|
