WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00020428 Gene Name  irld-48
Sequence Name  ? T11F1.2 Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans
Automated Description  Is affected by several genes including etr-1; rsr-2; and ints-5 based on tiling array; RNA-seq; and microarray studies. Is affected by adsorbable organic bromine compound based on microarray studies. Is predicted to encode a protein with the following domains: Receptor L domain; Receptor L-domain; SPS2 domain-containing protein; and Receptor L-domain superfamily. Biotype  SO:0001217
Genetic Position  II :-9.17957± Length (nt)  ? 2127
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00020428

Genomics

3 Transcripts

Class WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
NcPrimaryTranscript Transcript:T11F1.2b T11F1.2b 1358   II: 2956065-2958191
NcPrimaryTranscript Transcript:T11F1.2c T11F1.2c 1306   II: 2956065-2958191
MRNA Transcript:T11F1.2a.1 T11F1.2a.1 1291   II: 2956224-2958191
 

Other

1 CDSs

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
CDS:T11F1.2a T11F1.2a 1131   II: 2956682-2956814

2 RNAi Result

WormBase ID
WBRNAi00053106
WBRNAi00018587

52 Allele

Public Name
gk964317
gk963801
gk963671
tm11191
WBVar01436749
WBVar01436748
WBVar01436745
WBVar01436747
WBVar01436746
WBVar01436750
WBVar01934128
WBVar01765219
WBVar01765218
WBVar01503821
WBVar01503820
WBVar02074625
WBVar02078323
WBVar01982358
gk137289
gk137290
gk137291
gk137292
WBVar00100850
WBVar00100851
WBVar00100852
WBVar00215320
WBVar00215318
WBVar00215319
WBVar01234653
WBVar02080831

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
II Caenorhabditis elegans 15279421  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00020428 2956065 2958191 1

3 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  
Panther orthologue and paralogue predictions  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrII_2958192..2958607   416 II: 2958192-2958607 Caenorhabditis elegans

12 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  Transcripts of coding genes that showed significantly decreased expression in muscle. DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. WBPaper00062325:muscle_depleted_coding-RNA
  mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript
  Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. WBPaper00037950:AVE-neuron_L1-larva_expressed
  Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed
  Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. WBPaper00037950:glr-1(+)-neurons_L2-larva_expressed
  Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L1-larva_expressed
  Genes found to be regulated by low-copy overexpression of sir-2.1 with p < 0.014. N.A. WBPaper00026929:sir-2.1_overexpression_regulated
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ints-5(RNAi) comparing to in N2. DESeq2 and edgeR. WBPaper00056284:ints-5(RNAi)_upregulated
  mRNAs that were significantly enriched in the AIN-1 immunoprecipitation samples, compared to the control total mRNAs in the input extracts (p < 0.01). Signals from replicates of total worm lysates from wt and strains containing the ain-2::gfp or the ain-2 promoter::gfp transgene were mean normalized and averaged respectively to generate standard profiles of gene expression in these worm strains. Authors then calculated the ratio of signal of each gene from each IP sample to the standard gene expression profile of the corresponding worm strain. Based on this ratio, a percentile rank of each gene relative to all genes in each IP replicate was calculated. The percentile ranks in the three replicates of each IP were averaged. Student t test was utilized to determine if the average percentile ranks of enrichment of individual genes were significantly higher (p value) than the mean enrichment of all genes in the IP samples. To determine the AIN-1 or AIN-2 associated genes, we used the following criteria: (1) average percentile ranks of enrichment is greater than the mean enrichment of all genes in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP with p < 0.01; (2) average signal in AIN-1 or AIN-2 IP replicates is greater than the background signal (including 2X standard deviation (SD)) (Background signal and SD were calculated based on signals from empty spots on each microarray); (3) criteria 1 is not be satisfied for the same gene in the corresponding control IP. WBPaper00031252:AIN-1_IP_enriched
  Genes that showed significantly decreased expression level in rsr-2(RNAi) animals comparing to in gfp(RNAi) control. Fold change > 1.2 or < 0.8. WBPaper00042477:rsr-2(RNAi)_downregulated_TilingArray
  Coexpression clique No. 211, srj-42-srw-113, on the genome-wide coexpression clique map for the nematode GPL200 platform. All available microarray datasets for the GPL200 platform (Affymetrix C. elegans Genome Array) were obtained from the GEO repository. This included 2243 individual microarray experiments. These were normalized against each other with the software RMAexpress (Bolstad, 2014). Based on these normalized values, Pearsons correlation coefficients were obtained for each probe-probe pair of the 22,620 probes represented on this array type. The resulting list of correlation coefficients was then ranked to generate the ranked coexpression database with information on each probe represented on the GPL200 platform. WBPaper00061527:srj-42-srw-113
  Genes that showed significantly increased expression after exposure to adsorbable organic bromine compounds (AOBr) contained in water samples collected from Lake Stobensee in Berlin in August. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified with a random variance t-test and a significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) test. Genes were considered statistically significant if their p-value was less than 0.05, the false discovery rate less than 0.3, and the fold change compared to control at least <= 0.67 or >=1.5. WBPaper00046853:AOBr_LakeStobenseeAug_upregulated

2 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr1156710 Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015  
    Expr1014591 Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012  

0 GO Annotation

1 Homologues

Type
orthologue

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00020428 2956065 2958191 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
2127

1 Sequence Ontology Term