|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ogt-1(ok1474) neuronal cells isolated by FACs comparing to in FACs isolated neuronal cells from wild type. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066485:ogt-1(ok1474)_upregulated_neuron
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in hsp-6(mg585) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. |
EdgeR, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.001. |
WBPaper00056290:hsp-6(mg585)_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in mdt-15(mg584gf) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. |
EdgeR, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.001. |
WBPaper00056290:mdt-15(mg584)_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animal with pgph-2 overepxreesion [pgph-2p-pgph-2; myo-2p-mcherry] in glucose excess condition. |
Genes with anadjusted P-value <= 0.05 found by DESeq2 were assigned as differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00065926:pgph-2(overepxreesion)_upregulated_glucose
|
|
Reduced humidity (98% relative humidity). |
Genes that were down-regulated after one day exposure to reduced humidity (98% relative humidity) according to microarray analysis. |
Multiple hypothesis testing with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied on calculated p-values. A change in the expression level was considered to be significant if the adjusted p-value was less than 0.001. |
WBPaper00044578:reduced-humidity_downregulated_microarray
|
|
|
Genes that showed oscillating mRNA expression level throughout the 16 hour time courses from L3 larva to young adult. |
The following three lines of R code were used to perform the classification: increasing <-2*amplitude-PC1 < -1.7; oscillating <-!increasing & (amplitude > 0.55); flat <-!increasing & !oscillating; Note that the amplitude of a sinusoidal wave corresponds to only half the fold change between trough and peak. |
WBPaper00044736:oscillating_dev_expression
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in daf-2(e1370) comparing to in N2. |
Student's t-test, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00055386:daf-2(e1370)_upregulated
|
|
|
Genes regulated by DAF-12, according to whole transcriptome profiling to compare genome-wide regulatory influences of DPY-21 and SET-4 to those of the key transcription factors controlling dauer arrest in eak-7;akt-1 animals, DAF-16 and DAF-12. |
Authors identified genes differentially expressed between wild-type and eak-7;akt-1 double mutant animals [fold change >= 1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05]. Authors then compared the transcriptomes of eak-7;akt-1 double mutants to those of eak-7;akt-1 animals harboring mutations in dpy-21, set-4, daf-16, or daf-12, and identified genes that are differentially expressed in the opposite direction as in wild-type relative to eak-7;akt-1. Annotated gene expression data output from CuffDiff v2.2.1 was read into R version 3.2.1 for six comparisons: eak-7;akt-1 compared to (1) wild-type, (2) daf-16(mu86);eak-7;akt-1, (3) daf-12;eak-7;akt-1, (4) set-4(n4600);eak-7;akt-1, (5) set-4(dp268);eak-7;akt-1, and (6) dpy-21;eak-7;akt-1. Authors filtered genes by the following criteria: (1) status = OK for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1, (2) fold change (FC) >= 1.5 or FC <= 1/1.5 for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1 and (3) FDR < 0.05 for at least two separate comparisons. |
WBPaper00050801:DAF-12_dauer_regulome
|
|
|
Genes regulated by DAF-16, according to whole transcriptome profiling to compare genome-wide regulatory influences of DPY-21 and SET-4 to those of the key transcription factors controlling dauer arrest in eak-7;akt-1 animals, DAF-16 and DAF-12. |
Authors identified genes differentially expressed between wild-type and eak-7;akt-1 double mutant animals [fold change >= 1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05]. Authors then compared the transcriptomes of eak-7;akt-1 double mutants to those of eak-7;akt-1 animals harboring mutations in dpy-21, set-4, daf-16, or daf-12, and identified genes that are differentially expressed in the opposite direction as in wild-type relative to eak-7;akt-1. Annotated gene expression data output from CuffDiff v2.2.1 was read into R version 3.2.1 for six comparisons: eak-7;akt-1 compared to (1) wild-type, (2) daf-16(mu86);eak-7;akt-1, (3) daf-12;eak-7;akt-1, (4) set-4(n4600);eak-7;akt-1, (5) set-4(dp268);eak-7;akt-1, and (6) dpy-21;eak-7;akt-1. Authors filtered genes by the following criteria: (1) status = OK for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1, (2) fold change (FC) >= 1.5 or FC <= 1/1.5 for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1 and (3) FDR < 0.05 for at least two separate comparisons. |
WBPaper00050801:DAF-16_dauer_regulome
|
|
|
Genes regulated by DPY-21, according to whole transcriptome profiling to compare genome-wide regulatory influences of DPY-21 and SET-4 to those of the key transcription factors controlling dauer arrest in eak-7;akt-1 animals, DAF-16 and DAF-12. |
Authors identified genes differentially expressed between wild-type and eak-7;akt-1 double mutant animals [fold change >= 1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05]. Authors then compared the transcriptomes of eak-7;akt-1 double mutants to those of eak-7;akt-1 animals harboring mutations in dpy-21, set-4, daf-16, or daf-12, and identified genes that are differentially expressed in the opposite direction as in wild-type relative to eak-7;akt-1. Annotated gene expression data output from CuffDiff v2.2.1 was read into R version 3.2.1 for six comparisons: eak-7;akt-1 compared to (1) wild-type, (2) daf-16(mu86);eak-7;akt-1, (3) daf-12;eak-7;akt-1, (4) set-4(n4600);eak-7;akt-1, (5) set-4(dp268);eak-7;akt-1, and (6) dpy-21;eak-7;akt-1. Authors filtered genes by the following criteria: (1) status = OK for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1, (2) fold change (FC) >= 1.5 or FC <= 1/1.5 for wild-type vs. eak-7;akt-1 and (3) FDR < 0.05 for at least two separate comparisons. |
WBPaper00050801:DPY-21_dauer_regulome
|
|
|
Genes significantely Up-regulated by GRO-seq in csr-1 hypomorph vs. N2 using DESeq p < 0.05. |
DESeq package with an FDR of < 0.05. |
WBPaper00045050:csr-1(hypomorph)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts of coding genes that showed significantly increased expression in muscle. |
DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00062325:muscle_enriched_coding-RNA
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in aak-1(tm1944);aak-2(ok524) animals comparing to in N2. |
DEseq 1.18.0, adjusted p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00056471:aak-1(tm1944);aak-2(ok524)_downregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in jmjd-3.1p::jmjd-3.1 comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2 Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00049545:jmjd-3.1(+)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in rgef-1p::jmjd-1.2 comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2 Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00049545:rgef-1p-jmjd-1.2(+)_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sur-5p::jmjd-1.2 comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2 Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00049545:sur-5p-jmjd-1.2(+)_upregulated
|
|
feeding/starvation |
A large cluster of genes up-regulated during early larval development.. |
For each average expression value, the larger of the model-based error and empirical error was reported. ANOVA and T-tests were also computed in Rosetta Resolver using the reported errors. Expression values, errors, and P-values corresponding to transcript detection, ANOVAs, and T-tests were exported from Rosetta Resolver and analyzed elsewhere. |
WBPaper00032948:FedUp
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at just prior to the third UVC dose (48h). |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs under EtBr treatment without UVC exposure, at the -1h timepoint. |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_EtBr-exposed_48h
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at just prior to the third UVC dose (48h). |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the -1h timepoint (just prior to the third UVC dose (48h)). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_48h
|
|
control(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators).) vs UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed in control vs after UVC exposure and EtBr treatment at the 3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:control_vs_UVC-EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs EtBr-exposed(maintained under normal lab light (mostly dark, in incubators) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under UVC exposure and EtBr treatment vs under EtBr treatment but without UVC exposure at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_EtBr-exposed_51h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at just prior to the second UVC dose (24h). |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -25h timepoint (just prior to the second UVC dose (24h)). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_24h
|
|
UVC-EtBr-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total) and exposed to EtBr (5ug/mL in agar).) vs UVC-exposed(exposed to 7.5 J/m2 UVC radiation 3 times, 24 h apart (48 h total).) at 3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food. |
Genes differentially expressed under EtBr treatment and UVC exposure vs under UVC exposure but without EtBr treatment at the -3h timepoint (3 h after the third UVC dose (51h), which is also 3 h after being placed on food). |
Transcripts were defined as fold-change >1.2, p < 0.05 based on Rosetta Resolver analysis for all pairwise treatment comparisons. The fold-change refers to the second intensity over the first. |
WBPaper00041939:UVC-EtBr-exposed_vs_UVC-exposed_51h
|
|
|
Genes with expression 1.5X depleted in PVD and OLL neurons. |
Data sets were normalized by RMA and transcripts showing relative PVD enrichment (>=1.5X) vs. the reference sample were identified by SAM analysis (False Discovery Rate, FDR < 1%) |
WBPaper00036375:depleted_in_PVD_OLL
|
|
|
Down-regulated genes (fold change > 1.5) in two CoQ-deficient clk-1 mutant strains (e2519, qm30) compared to wild types N2. |
Fold-changes of intensities were calculated from the arithmetic mean of gene expression values between experimental and corresponding control group. Fold change >= 1.5 was used as cut-off. |
WBPaper00045774:clk-1_downregulated
|
|
moderate static magnetic field |
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression after exposure to moderate static magnetic field. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00064509:static-magnetic-field_downregulated
|
|
|
Gene transcripts in this set are up-regulated at 5% FDR between L4 lethargus and L4 AND between L4 lethargus and 4-hour old adults. |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used to determine differential gene expression using the R/maanova package. |
WBPaper00045960:L4-lethargus_upregulated
|
|
Bacteria: B.subtilis |
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression when animals were fed by probiotic bacteria strain B.subtilis PXN21 comparing to animals fed with OP50 from L1 till day 1 adult. |
edgeR 3.16.5, FDR < 0.05, fold change > 2. |
WBPaper00059117:B.subtilis_upregulated
|
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in tetraploid N2 comparing to diploid N2 animals at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq2 R package (1.20.0), fold change > 2, and FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066110:tetraploid_vs_diploid_upregulated
|
