WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00045354 Gene Name  mir-796
Sequence Name  ? C14E2.8 Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans
Automated Description  Is affected by several genes including prg-1; hrpk-1; and alg-5 based on RNA-seq studies. Is affected by multi-walled carbon nanotube and sanguinarine based on RNA-seq studies. Biotype  SO:0001265
Genetic Position  X :-17.5339± Length (nt)  ? 89
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00045354

Genomics

1 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:C14E2.8a C14E2.8a 23   X: 1798979-1799001
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

15 Allele

Public Name
gk963725
gk964444
gk964445
gk963977
tm10740
WBVar01690114
WBVar00075444
WBVar00075445
WBVar02123948
WBVar02123610
WBVar01467722
WBVar01467721
WBVar01467719
WBVar02121345
WBVar02122180

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
X Caenorhabditis elegans 17718942  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00045354 1798928 1799016 -1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrX_1795674..1798927   3254 X: 1795674-1798927 Caenorhabditis elegans

19 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L3 larva comparing to in N2 L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in hrpk-1(tm5522) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(tm5522)_upregulated_miRNA_L4
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood mir-71(n4115) animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_mir-71(n4115)
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_N2
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L3
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L4
Fasting for 48 hours, from 3 days post L4 to 5 days post L4. MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after 48 hours of fasting p < 0.0002, Fishers exact test. WBPaper00051247:fasting_upregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from L1 larva to young adult. DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change. WBPaper00045019:MWCNT_downregulated
  miRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after 48 hour treatment in 10uM sanguinarine. Fold change > 2. WBPaper00055663:sanguinarine_upregulated
space radition and microgravity Micro RNAs that showed decreased expression in space flight N2 samples comparing to in ground control, affected by space radition and microgravity. Differentially expressed miRNAs (>1.5-fold change and <0.67) and mRNAs (>2-fold change and <0.5) were identified through fold-change filtering. WBPaper00048474:SpaceRadiation-Microgravity_downregulated_N2
space radition Micro RNAs that showed decreased expression in space flight N2 samples (animals were put in a centrifugal device in space) comparing to in ground control, affected by space radition but not microgravity. Differentially expressed miRNAs (>1.5-fold change and <0.67) and mRNAs (>2-fold change and <0.5) were identified through fold-change filtering. WBPaper00048474:SpaceRadiation_downregulated_N2

0 Expression Patterns

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00045354 1798928 1799016 -1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
89

1 Sequence Ontology Term