|
miRNAs that showed increased expression after exposure to graphene oxide (GO) |
The dysregulated expression of miRNAs in GO-exposed nematodes was analyzed by DESeq (an R package, a powerful tool to estimate the variance and test for differential expression). The data were extracted as up- or down-regulated miRNAs according to a cutoff of 2 fold change, and were presented in the scatter diagram after normalization. |
WBPaper00045209:graphene-oxide_upregulated
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_downregulated_adult
|
|
miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade, comparing to in N2 animals at 26 centigrade. |
DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_N2_26C_downregulated
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). |
Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. |
WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from L1 larva to young adult. |
DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change. |
WBPaper00045019:MWCNT_upregulated
|
Fasting for 48 hours, from 3 days post L4 to 5 days post L4. |
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after 48 hours of fasting |
p < 0.0002, Fishers exact test. |
WBPaper00051247:fasting_downregulated
|
|
miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
|
|
miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in hrpk-1(tm5522) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. |
WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(tm5522)_downregulated_miRNA_L4
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L1 larva comparing to in N2 embryo. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
|
Exposed to 1mg / L PM2.5 from L1 larva to young adult. |
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter PM2.5 from L1 larva to young adult. |
DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00054985:PM2.5_upregulated
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
|