WormMine

WS296

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003279 Gene Name  mir-51
Sequence Name  ? F36H1.7 Brief Description  mir-51 encodes a microRNA, a small non-protein coding RNA and has a potential ortholog in C. briggsae; mir-51 is expressed constitutively throughout development; many of the known microRNAs are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of genes; the precise function of mir-51 is not known.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Expressed in arcade cell and tail hypodermis.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position  IV :4.78521 ±0.00072
Length (nt)  ? 100
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003279

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:F36H1.7b F36H1.7b 22   IV: 11026035-11026056
Transcript:F36H1.7a F36H1.7a 23   IV: 11026074-11026096
 

Other

0 CDSs

2 RNAi Result

WormBase ID
WBRNAi00112525
WBRNAi00112524

11 Allele

Public Name
gk964278
gk964078
gk964500
gk962765
WBVar02123093
WBVar02124207
n4473
nDf67
WBVar01795457
gk662282
dev329

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
IV Caenorhabditis elegans 17493829  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00003279 11026013 11026112 -1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrIV_11025871..11026012   142 IV: 11025871-11026012 Caenorhabditis elegans

40 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L3 larva comparing to in N2 L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  Transcripts depleted in purified oocyte P bodies comparing to in whole oocytes. DESeq2, FDR < 0.05, fold change > 2. WBPaper00065975:P-body_vs_oocyte_depleted
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
Bacteria Diet: L. plantarum with pdxH mutant vs. L. plantarum Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in N2 animals fed with L. plantarum with pdxH mutant, comparing to in N2 animals fed with L. plantarum. GFold3, logFC < -1 or > 1. WBPaper00066703:L.plantarum-pdxH_downregulated
  Potental DAF-12 target genes identified by ChIP-chip analysis performed on strain ALF4 [daf-12 Affymetrix TAS software that computed for each probe estimates of fold enrichment (in linear scale) over hybridization with input DNA. At the same time, TAS calculated for each probe a p-value by applying a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A threshold of 2.5 was selected, which corresponds to probe intensities approximately 2.5 times stronger on the ChIP array than on the Input array. Additional TAS threshold parameters were MinRun=180 bp, MaxGap=300 bp. TAS analysis showed that the selected threshold of 2.5 corresponds approximately to a p-value of 0.01. WBPaper00040221:DAF-12_target_ALF4
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in coelomocyte. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_coelomocyte
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in hypodermis. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_hypodermis
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in hrpk-1(tm5522) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(tm5522)_downregulated_miRNA_L4
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
Heat Shock: 35C 4 hours at L4 larva stage. Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after L4 larva N2 animals were heat stressed at 35C for 4 hours DESeq2 WBPaper00057154:HeatShock_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNAs with age dependent abundance in wild type animals. Details available in Supplementary material of the paper. Diff Exp, is the approximate ratio of expression comparing Young to Old animals (11 day difference in age). The raw p-value is for the null hypothesis that the Diff exp Ratio = 1 (based on robust inference - see supplemental information) and the associated 95% CI of the ratio. WBPaper00042527:age_dependent_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood mir-71(n4115) animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_downregulated_miRNA_mir-71(n4115)
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in drsh-1(ok369) comparing to in N2. Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00055896:drsh-1(ok369)_downregulated
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in hrpk-1(zen17) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(zen17)_downregulated_miRNA_L4
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_downregulated_miRNA_N2

4 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr8456 Expression detected from mid embryos to adults. In late embryos, expression is seen on one side of the embryo, ventral and mostly anterior. From late embryo to L1, expression is detected in canal cells and canal nerves. Also, from late embryos to adults, expression is detected in several nerves, including dnc and vnc. In addition, expression is detected in head muscles, coelomocytes and intestine.  
    Expr9254 miR-51 GFP reporter was restricted in expression to anterior and ventral cells identified as neurons, tail hypodermal cells, cells of the excretory system, and the arcade cells.  
    Expr2482 Intense signals were detected in embryos, larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4), adults, and glp-4(bn2) adults.  
    Expr10908    

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00003279 11026013 11026112 -1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
100

1 Sequence Ontology Term