WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003291 Gene Name  mir-63
Sequence Name  ? C16H3.5 Brief Description  mir-63 encodes a microRNA (miRNA), a small noncoding RNA that is likely involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression; miR-63 is expressed at high levels during all developmental stages and in glp-4 mutant hermaphrodites lacking a germline; miR-63 is also detected in him-8 mutants and dauer larvae; miR-63 does not appear to have orthologs in other species, and the targets of miR-63 are not yet known.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Expressed in neurons.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position  X :24.4365 ±0.040415
Length (nt)  ? 104
Paste the following link
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Lists
This Gene isn't in any lists. Upload a list.

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003291

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:C16H3.5b C16H3.5b 24   X: 17598785-17598808
Transcript:C16H3.5a C16H3.5a 23   X: 17598827-17598849
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

14 Allele

Public Name
gk964260
gk963810
gk963581
gk964447
gk308337
WBVar02122067
WBVar02122068
cdb218
n4568
cdb227
cdb241
cdb245
cdb243
cdb247

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
X Caenorhabditis elegans 17718942  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003291 17598765 17598868 -1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrX_17579880..17598764   18885 X: 17579880-17598764 Caenorhabditis elegans

31 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. 24 hours of exposure. Small RNAs (21-26nt) that showed significantly increased expression after L4 animals were exposed to P .aeruginosa strain PA14 for 24 hours. DESeq2, FDR < 0.05 WBPaper00056868:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_smallRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in hypodermis. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_hypodermis
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
Fasting for 48 hours, from 3 days post L4 to 5 days post L4. MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after 48 hours of fasting p < 0.0002, Fishers exact test. WBPaper00051247:fasting_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood mir-71(n4115) animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_mir-71(n4115)
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_N2
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_upregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in mir-71(n4115) comparing to in N2 at 4-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:mir-71(n4115)_upregulated_miRNA
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 miRNAs up regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. N.A. WBPaper00046303:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L1 larva comparing to in N2 embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L1_vs_embryo_upregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in hrpk-1(zen17) comparing to in N2 at embryo stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(zen17)_upregulated_miRNA_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in animals after 24 hour exposure to 100ug per ml silica nanoparticles (SiNPs). The random variance model (RVM)t-test was applied toidentify differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAsbetween the SiNPs-treated group and the control group. P-value <0.05 and fold change (FC) >1.5 were considered as the threshold screening between the SiNP-treated groupand the control group. WBPaper00060100:SiNP_upregulated_miRNA

4 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr15763    
    Expr8465 Expression detected from comma stage to adults. Expression seen in intestine.  
    Expr10912    
    Expr2490 Intense signals were detected in embryos, larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4), adults, and glp-4(bn2) adults.  

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003291 17598765 17598868 -1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
104

1 Sequence Ontology Term