|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
|
|
Transcripts of noncoding genes that showed significantly increased expression in muscle. |
DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00062325:muscle_enriched_noncoding-RNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly altered expression in hsf-1(+);+HS vs hsf-1(RNAi);+HS. Worms remained on RNAi plates until the L4 larval-stage before being heat shocked by submerging plates in a 33C water bath for 30 minutes. |
The Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing was then used to determine significantly altered miRNAs between each treatment condition. Micro RNAs with q-value < 0.05 was considered differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00052959:hsf-1(RNAi)_regulated_miRNA_HS-dependent
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). |
Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. |
WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
|
|
miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
|
|
miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in mir-71(n4115) comparing to in N2 at 4-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite. |
Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. |
WBPaper00053318:mir-71(n4115)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNAs that showed decreased expression after exposure to graphene oxide (GO) |
The dysregulated expression of miRNAs in GO-exposed nematodes was analyzed by DESeq (an R package, a powerful tool to estimate the variance and test for differential expression). The data were extracted as up- or down-regulated miRNAs according to a cutoff of 2 fold change, and were presented in the scatter diagram after normalization. |
WBPaper00045209:graphene-oxide_downregulated
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_downregulated_adult
|
Exposed to 1mg / L PM2.5 from L1 larva to young adult. |
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter PM2.5 from L1 larva to young adult. |
DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change, p-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00054985:PM2.5_upregulated
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA that showed significantly decreased expression in stau-1(tm2266) comparing to in N2. |
Differentially expressed genes were identified using edgeR package in R. |
WBPaper00049286:stau-1(tm2266)_downregulated
|