Genomics
2 Transcripts
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcript:C18D1.1a.1 | C18D1.1a.1 |
2744
 |
II: 10061302-10067917 |
| Transcript:C18D1.1b.1 | C18D1.1b.1 |
1869
|
II: 10062105-10064481 |
Other
2 CDSs
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDS:C18D1.1a | C18D1.1a |
1941
|
II: 10062105-10062211 |
| CDS:C18D1.1b | C18D1.1b |
1869
|
II: 10062105-10062211 |
42 RNAi Result
111 Allele
| Public Name |
|---|
| gk963801 |
| gk963053 |
| gk962682 |
| gk964326 |
| WBVar01696261 |
| WBVar01696262 |
| WBVar01604555 |
| tm496 |
| WBVar01720513 |
| WBVar01439315 |
| WBVar01439314 |
| WBVar01439319 |
| h16129 |
| WBVar01666582 |
| WBVar01960201 |
| WBVar02050824 |
| gk425305 |
| gk832079 |
| gk673302 |
| gk410864 |
| WBVar01627149 |
| gk585990 |
| gk628733 |
| gk319094 |
| gk416553 |
| gk656598 |
| gk378265 |
| gk711672 |
| gk712645 |
| gk696145 |
1 Chromosome Location
|
Feature . Primary Identifier |
Start | End | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBGene00000995 | 10061302 | 10067917 | -1 |
4 Data Sets
| Name | URL |
|---|---|
| WormBaseAcedbConverter | |
| GO Annotation data set | |
| C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene) | |
| Panther orthologue and paralogue predictions |
1 Downstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrII_10060661..10061301 | 641 | II: 10060661-10061301 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
204 Expression Clusters
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genes with expression altered >= 3-fold in dpy-10(e128) mutants. | Data across the wild type series was analyzed using the Significance analysis of Microarrays (SAM) algorithm (to calculate the False Discovery Rate (FDR)). | WBPaper00035873:dpy-10_regulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in L1 neural cells comparing to in adult neural cells. | DESeq2 (v1.18.1) fold change > 2, P-adj<0.05, using BenjaminiHochberg correction. | WBPaper00060811:L1_vs_adult_upregulated_neural | |
| Transcripts of coding genes that showed significantly decreased expression in muscle. | DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. | WBPaper00062325:muscle_depleted_coding-RNA | |
| Transcripts expressed in neuronal cells, by analyzingfluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) neurons. | DESeq. False discovry rate (FDR) < 0.1. | WBPaper00048988:neuron_expressed | |
| adult vs dauer larva | Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. | N.A. | WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C |
| mRNAs that showed decreased expression in 1 cell mebryo comparing to in oocyte, according to RNAseq analysis. | Gaussian error propagation. As cutoff for the up-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change > 1 and P < 0.05 and as cutoff for the down-regulated genes authors used log2 fold change < -1 and P < 0.05. | WBPaper00045420:fertilization_downregulated_transcript | |
| Osmotic stress | Transcripts that showed significantly altered expression with 500 mM salt (NaCl) vs 100 mM salt when food was present | DESeq(version 1.10.1), FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00050726:OsmoticStress_regulated_Food |
| Transcripts that showed significantly higher expression in somatic gonad precursor cells (SGP) vs. head mesodermal cells (hmc). | DESeq2, fold change >= 2, FDR <= 0.01. | WBPaper00056826:SGP_biased | |
| Transcripts expressed in the epithelial tissues surrounding the pharynx that includes the arcade and intestinal valve (AIV) cells, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pbath-15-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:arcade_intestinal-valve_expressed | |
| Genes significantly enriched in NSM neurons (isolated by FACS) versus the reference, according to RNAseq analysis towards total RNA. | Gene expression quantification and differential expression was analyzed using cufflinks v2.2.1. Enriched contains only genes significantly enriched (differentially expressed >= 2.4 fold in total RNA or >= 3.2 fold in DSN treated total RNA) in the NSM neurons versus the reference. | WBPaper00045974:NSM_enriched_totalRNA_RNAseq | |
| Transcripts expressed in seam cells, according to PAT-Seq analysis using Pgrd-10-GFP-3XFLAG mRNA tagging. | Cufflinks FPKM value >=1. | WBPaper00050990:seam_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in day 3 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in L4 larva daf-16(mu86);glp-1(e2141) animals. | Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05 | WBPaper00064088:Day-3-adult_vs_L4_downregulated_daf-16(mu86);glp-1(e2141) | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in day 3 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in L4 larva glp-1(e2141) animals. | Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05 | WBPaper00064088:Day-3-adult_vs_L4_downregulated_glp-1(e2141) | |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 10 mix) vs BT407 6h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.1mix_downregulated_6h |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 10 mix) vs BT407 12h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.1mix_downregulated_12h |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 2 mix) vs BT407 6h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.5mix_downregulated_6h |
| Bacteria infection: Bacillus thuringiensis | mRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after pathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis infections comparing to non pathogenic BT (BT247(1 to 2 mix) vs BT407 12h), according to RNAseq. | Cuffdiff, ajusted p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00046497:B.thuringiensis_0.5mix_downregulated_12h |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in hrde-1(tm1200) animals, comparing to in N2, after growing at 25C for five generations (late generation). | CuffDiff2 | WBPaper00051265:F4_hrde-1(tm1200)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly changed expression in 6-day post-L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite animals. | Sleuth | WBPaper00051558:aging_regulated | |
| Transcripts depleted in purified oocyte P bodies comparing to in whole oocytes. | DESeq2, FDR < 0.05, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065975:P-body_vs_oocyte_depleted | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 20C, comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:Day10_vs_Day1_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in tetraploid N2 comparing to diploid N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2 R package (1.20.0), fold change > 2, and FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066110:tetraploid_vs_diploid_downregulated | |
| Genes that showed oscillating mRNA expression level throughout the 16 hour time courses from L3 larva to young adult. | The following three lines of R code were used to perform the classification: increasing <-2*amplitude-PC1 < -1.7; oscillating <-!increasing & (amplitude > 0.55); flat <-!increasing & !oscillating; Note that the amplitude of a sinusoidal wave corresponds to only half the fold change between trough and peak. | WBPaper00044736:oscillating_dev_expression | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:dopaminergic-neurons_L3-L4-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:glr-1(+)-neurons_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:hypodermis_L3-L4-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L3/L4 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:PVD-OLL-neurons_L3-L4-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts detected in germline isolated from day-1 adult hermaphrodite animals. | All three experiments have CPM >= 1. | WBPaper00067147:germline_expressed |
17 Expression Patterns
| Remark | Reporter Gene | Primary Identifier | Pattern | Subcellular Localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expr1030620 | Tiling arrays expression graphs | |||
| Reporter gene expression pattern confirmed to match exactly with antibody staining. | Expression pattern was observed with anti-GFP rabbit antibody staining. | Expr1625 | Maternally expressed DIE-1 can be detected in all blastomeres of the early embryo. Zygotic DIE-1 expression is prominent in the posterior half of the embryo, in the nuclei of muscle and hypodermal precursors. Shortly after the hypodermal cells undergo their terminal divisions, DIE-1 can be detected very strongly in the dorsal hypodermis. As intercalation proceeds, DIE-1 expression becomes weaker in these cells. The "pointer" cells, which are the last dorsal hypodermal cells to intercalate, maintain elevated levels of DIE-1 longer than other dorsal hypodermal cells. DIE-1 is undetectable in the nuclei of C-derived dorsal cells by the time intercalation is complete. In addition to expression in dorsal hypodermal cells, DIE-1 is present in ventral hypodermal cells during the process of enclosure; expression ceases in the hypodermis after enclosure has completed, prior to the process of elongation. DIE-1 is also present in pharyngeal cells and in the gut primordium. DIE-1 is also expressed in muscle cells, as confirmed by double-staining die-1::gfp-expressing embryos with anti-GFP and muscle-specific antibodies. Nuclei containing GFP indicative of DIE-1 expression were consistently observed within the rows of muscle. After enclosure is complete, DIE-1 expression completely disappears in all tissues until late in embryogenesis, at which time ~15 cells between the anterior and posterior bulbs of the pharynx express die-1::gfp. DIE-1 is also present in numerous cells along the ventral midline in L2L4 larvae. | nuclei |
| Temporal description | Expr11487 | The die-1 fosmid reporter is initially expressed very broadly throughout the developing embryo, including the hypodermis, where die-1 acts to ensure ventral enclosure during gastrulation. Mirroring antibody staining, reporter expression of the fosmid reporter vanishes at approximately 460 min of embryonic development. die-1 expression then reinitiates in many neurons,including both ASEL and ASER; shortly thereafter, expression in ASER becomes undetectable. ASEL-restricted expression is maintained throughout the embryonic, larval, and adult stages. die-1 is also expressed in an asymmetric manner in the AWC olfactory neuron pair. Most adult animals show a strong bias of expression of die-1 to either the left or right AWC neuron. This antisymmetric die-1 expression is already evident in late embryos when the initial decision of AWC asymmetry control is made. ASEL-specific expression of die-1can be observed before any AWC expression of die-1 is observed. Expression of the die-1 fosmid reporter correlates with the AWC OFF state. | ||
| Clone: pUL#JRH6B3 | Expr7440 | A complex embryonic expression pattern. Post embryonically, expression is seen in the dorsal and ventral nerve cords as well as three pairs of cells in the head and two pairs in the tail. | ||
| Reporter gene fusion type not specified. The autonomous function of die-1 in the mature ASEL neurons was corroborated by expressing the die-1 complementary DNA under the control of the promoter of the ASEL-specific gcy-7 gene. When expressed in a die-1 mutant background, three of four lines showed rescue of the lsy phenotype. | Expr3425 | A die-1::gfp reporter gene, which rescues the lsy defect, shows a dynamic expression profile with early hypodermal expression ceasing at gastrulation and then reappearing in late embryos in several putative head neurons. Using an ASE-neuron-expressed red-fluorescent-protein reporter (ceh-36prom::rfp), two of these neurons were identified as ASEL and ASER. However, expression is strongly biased towards ASEL. Besides ASE expression, consistent and strong expression of gfp from the otIs159 array is also observed in the ASH, ADF and AWC neurons. | ||
| Expr10659 | Until the comma stage die-1 is expressed in ASER and ASEL (fig 2). Asymmetric die-1 expression becomes apparent at the 3-fold stage of embryogenesis in ASEL. | |||
| Expr10658 | Asymmetric die-1 expression becomes apparent at the 3-fold stage of embryogenesis in ASEL. | |||
| Expr10267 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10483 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10484 | Inferred Expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr2010926 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr1017570 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012 | |||
| Expr1200016 | Data from the TransgeneOme project | |||
| Expr2029165 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr1170040 | Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy was performed, including DIC for morphology. Gene expression patterns were summarized in 4 manners: Average over time, Average over time and at different positions along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis, a voxelized representation over time, and on individual cells overlaid from a reference coordinate dataset (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.014). The analysis was done with a pipeline based on the multi-purpose image analysis software Endrov (https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2478), which further is needed to browse the raw recording data. Thumbnail movies were also generated, using maximum Z projection for the 3D fluorescence channel. Raw recordings available in the Endrov OST-file format are available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BIAD191?query=S-BIAD191 | |||
| Expr1200085 | Data from the TransgeneOme project | |||
| Expr1144963 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015 |
5 GO Annotation
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| occurs_in(WBbt:0005663) | involved_in |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00002988),results_in_specification_of(WBbt:0003904),part_of(GO:0003388) | involved_in |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00001532),results_in_specification_of(WBbt:0003903),part_of(GO:0003388) | involved_in |
| occurs_in(WBbt:0005663) | involved_in |
| involved_in |
5 Ontology Annotations
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| occurs_in(WBbt:0005663) | involved_in |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00002988),results_in_specification_of(WBbt:0003904),part_of(GO:0003388) | involved_in |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00001532),results_in_specification_of(WBbt:0003903),part_of(GO:0003388) | involved_in |
| occurs_in(WBbt:0005663) | involved_in |
| involved_in |
1 Upstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrII_10067918..10068554 | 637 | II: 10067918-10068554 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
