Genomics
1 Transcripts
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcript:C37E2.4.1 | C37E2.4.1 |
1167
 |
X: 14183221-14186566 |
Other
1 CDSs
| WormMine ID | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDS:C37E2.4 | C37E2.4 |
774
|
X: 14183449-14183579 |
74 Allele
| Public Name |
|---|
| gk964260 |
| gk964029 |
| gk962707 |
| gk964028 |
| gk963810 |
| gk963581 |
| gk300421 |
| gk300420 |
| gk300423 |
| gk300422 |
| gk300425 |
| gk300424 |
| gk300426 |
| gk300431 |
| gk300428 |
| gk300427 |
| gk300430 |
| gk300429 |
| tm251 |
| n5333 |
| n5340 |
| WBVar01760169 |
| WBVar01988132 |
| p17 |
| gk841428 |
| gk713468 |
| WBVar01572859 |
| gk314274 |
| gk464409 |
| gk728290 |
1 Chromosome Location
|
Feature . Primary Identifier |
Start | End | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBGene00000457 | 14183221 | 14186566 | -1 |
4 Data Sets
| Name | URL |
|---|---|
| WormBaseAcedbConverter | |
| GO Annotation data set | |
| C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene) | |
| Panther orthologue and paralogue predictions |
1 Downstream Intergenic Region
| WormBase ID | Name | Sequence Name | Length (nt) | Chromosome Location | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intergenic_region_chrX_14181706..14183220 | 1515 | X: 14181706-14183220 | Caenorhabditis elegans |
117 Expression Clusters
| Regulated By Treatment | Description | Algorithm | Primary Identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in L1 neural cells comparing to in adult neural cells. | DESeq2 (v1.18.1) fold change > 2, P-adj<0.05, using BenjaminiHochberg correction. | WBPaper00060811:L1_vs_adult_upregulated_neural | |
| Transcripts of coding genes that showed significantly decreased expression in muscle. | DESeq2 (version 1.24.0). Transcripts with a false-discovery rate adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. | WBPaper00062325:muscle_depleted_coding-RNA | |
| Transcripts expressed in neuronal cells, by analyzingfluorescence-activated cell sorted (FACS) neurons. | DESeq. False discovry rate (FDR) < 0.1. | WBPaper00048988:neuron_expressed | |
| adult vs dauer larva | Transcripts that showed differential expression in adult vs dauer lava in N2 animals at 20C. | N.A. | WBPaper00050488:adult_vs_dauer_regulated_N2_20C |
| Osmotic stress | Transcripts that showed significantly altered expression with 500 mM salt (NaCl) vs 100 mM salt when food was present | DESeq(version 1.10.1), FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00050726:OsmoticStress_regulated_Food |
| Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. | DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. | WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched | |
| Osmotic stress | Transcripts that showed significantly altered expression with 500 mM salt (NaCl) vs 100 mM salt when no food was present | DESeq(version 1.10.1), FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00050726:OsmoticStress_regulated_NoFood |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression after animals were treated with 100uM Psora and 250uM Allantoin from day 1 to day 3 adult hermaphradite. | DESeq2(v1.14.1), fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05 | WBPaper00055354:Psora-Allantoin_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression after animals were treated with 100uM Rapamycin and 50mM Metformin from day 1 to day 3 adult hermaphradite. | DESeq2(v1.14.1), fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05 | WBPaper00055354:Rapamycin-Metformin_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in sin-3(tm1276) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00061203:sin-3(tm1276)_upregulated | |
| Top 300 transcripts enriched in ABalppppppa, ABpraaapppa according to single cell RNAseq. | Top 300 enriched transcripts were determined by log2.ratio of the tpm in the cell type vs the tpm in the other cells * the log2 of the cell.type tpm. | WBPaper00061340:ASE_parent | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in sin-3(tm1276) comparing to in N2 at early embryo when there were only 3 -5 eggs in the adult. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, adjusted p-value < 0.01 | WBPaper00058598:sin-3(tm1276)_downregulated | |
| 25C vs. 20C | Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 25C, comparing to in N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:25C_vs_20C_upregulated |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in 10-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 grown at 20C, comparing to in 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite N2 animals grown at 20C. | CuffDiff, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00065096:Day10_vs_Day1_upregulated | |
| Gamma irradiation 100 mGY per hour for 72 hours since L1 larva. | Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression after exposure to 100mGy per hour gamma irradiation from L1 to day 1 adult hermaphrodite stage. | DESeq2, FDR <= 0.05, log2 fold change >= 0.3 or <= -0.3. | WBPaper00058958:100mGy-irradiation-72h_upregulated |
| Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in tetraploid N2 comparing to diploid N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2 R package (1.20.0), fold change > 2, and FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066110:tetraploid_vs_diploid_downregulated | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:all-neurons_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (L2 all cell reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:coelomocytes_L2-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in hda-1(ne4752[3xFLAG-Degron-HDA-1]) in gonads dissected from 1-day old adult animals. | Salmon was used to map the mRNA-seq reads with the worm database WS268, and its output files were imported to DESeq2 in R. The differentially expressed genes were filtered by fold change more than 2 and adjusted p-value < 0.05. The scatter plots were generated by the plot function in R. | WBPaper00061479:hda-1(ne4752)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated | |
| Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. 4 hours at 25C. | Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression after N2 L4 animals were infected by P. aeruginosa (PA14) bacteria for 24 hours at 25C. | DESeq R package (1.18.0), FDR < 0.05 and fold change > 2. | WBPaper00062184:PA14_downregulated |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in srbc-48(ac23);kyIs262;fer-1(b232ts) comparing to in kyIs262;fer-1(b232ts), 24h after infection with P.aeruginosa. | DESeq2, FDR <0.05, fold change > 2. | WBPaper00059664:srbc-48(ac23)_upregulated | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in dpy-21(e428) comparing to in N2 during L3 stage. | DESeq v1.6.3. Fold change > 1.5. | WBPaper00050370:dpy-21(e428)_L3_upregulated | |
| Starvation | Transcripts that showed significantly altered expression by starvation with 100 mM salt (NaCl) | DESeq(version 1.10.1), FDR < 0.05. | WBPaper00050726:starvation_regulated_LowSalt |
| Bacteria diet: Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (CBM 588) | Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression after fed with probiotic bacteria Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 (CBM 588) for five days, comparing to control groups that were fed with OP50. | DESeq 1.30.0, log2 fold change > 2, p-value < 0.05 | WBPaper00055944:C.butyricum_vs_OP50_downregulated |
| Genes significantely Up-regulated by GRO-seq in csr-1 hypomorph vs. N2 using DESeq p < 0.05. | DESeq package with an FDR of < 0.05. | WBPaper00045050:csr-1(hypomorph)_upregulated | |
| Genes that showed expression levels higher than the corresponding reference sample (embryonic 24hr reference). | A Mann-Whitney U test with an empirical background model and FDR correction for multiple testing was used to detect expressed transcripts (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995). Genes and TARs with an FDR <= 0.05 were reported as expressed above background. Authors detected differentially expressed transcripts using a method based on linear models. Genes and TARs were called differentially expressed if the FDR was <= 0.05 and the fold change (FC) >= 2.0. To more strictly correct for potential false-positives resulting from multiple sample comparisons, authors divided individual FDR estimates by the number of samplesor sample comparisons, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted FDR of 1.3 * 0.0001 for expression above background and of 7.4 * 0.0001 for differential expression. Authors called genes selectively enriched in a given tissue if they met the following requirements: (1) enriched expression in a given tissue (FDR <= 0.05 and FC >= 2.0), (2) fold change versus reference among the upper 40% of the positive FC range observed for this gene across all tissues, and (3) fold-change entropy among the lower 40% of the distribution observed for all genes. | WBPaper00037950:hypodermis_L1-larva_expressed | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in animals fed with JM103 bacteria producing Cry5B, comparing to control animals fed with JM103. | ANOVA, p-value < 0.05. | WBPaper00056167:Cry5B_upregulated | |
| Strictly embryonic class (SE): genes that are the subset of embryonic genes that are not also classified as maternal. | A modified Welch F statistic was used for ANOVA. For each gene, regressed error estimates were substituted for observed error estimates. The substitution is justified by the lack of consistency among the most and least variable genes at each time point. Regressed error estimates were abundance-dependent pooled error estimates that represented a median error estimate from a window of genes of similar abundance to the gene of interest. A randomization test was used to compute the probability Pg of the observed F statistic for gene g under the null hypothesis that developmental time had no effect on expression. P-values were not corrected for multiple testing. | [cgc5767]:expression_class_SE | |
| Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in spr-1(ok2144) comparing to in N2. | DESeq2, fold change > 2, p-value < 0.01. | WBPaper00061203:spr-1(ok2144)_upregulated |
23 Expression Patterns
| Remark | Reporter Gene | Primary Identifier | Pattern | Subcellular Localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expr2009880 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Picture: Figure 1a. | Marker15 | Expressed ASE and AWC neurons. | ||
| Expr1019613 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/levin2012 | |||
| Picture: Fig 2A. | Marker98 | Marker for ASEL and ASER neurons. | ||
| Expr1030261 | Tiling arrays expression graphs | |||
| Clone: pUL#JRH/AB4 | Expr7468 | Very strong expression specific to head neurons; number varies but 4 often strong, occasionally 6, in 3 pairs. Late embryo to adult. | ||
| Expr2743 | ceh-36::gfp was broadly expressed during early embryonic development. ceh-36 expression became restricted to the AWC and ASE chemosensory neuron nuclei during late embryonic stages and was maintained through the adult stage. ceh-36::gfp expression was observed in both the ASEL and ASER neurons. | nuclei | ||
| Expr2877 | Both fusions showed gfp expression in ASE and AWC chemosensory neurons. | |||
| Expr15584 | ||||
| Expr10241 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10242 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10244 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10247 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10246 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| [ceh-36::gfp] translational fusion. A ceh-36::gfp translational fusion gene was generated by an in-frame insertion of a gfp-coding sequence into the 3' end of the ceh-36-coding sequence flanked by the 2.5 kb 5' upstream and 1.1 kb 3' downstream genomic sequence. | Expr9882 | CEH-36::GFP was present in the MI grandmother cell, ABaraappa, but not in the e3D grandmother cell.CEH-36::GFP in the MI grandmother cell became detectable 25 minutes after this cell was generated. We also found that CEH-36::GFP was present in the MI mother cell ABaraappaa but not in the e3D mother cell. | ||
| Expr2028120 | Single cell embryonic expression. Only cell types with an expression fraction of greater 0.2 of the maximum expressed fraction are labeled (Full data can be downloaded from http://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/packer2019/). The colors represent the broad cell class to which the cell type has been assigned. The size of the point is proportional to the log2 of the numbers of cells in the dataset of that cell type. Interactive visualizations are available as a web app (https://cello.shinyapps.io/celegans/) and can also be installed as an R package (https://github.com/qinzhu/VisCello.celegans). | |||
| Expr10248 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr15299 | ceh-36::GFP is expressed during gastrulation, most notably in a region surrounding the ventral cleft. | |||
| Expr1170083 | Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy was performed, including DIC for morphology. Gene expression patterns were summarized in 4 manners: Average over time, Average over time and at different positions along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis, a voxelized representation over time, and on individual cells overlaid from a reference coordinate dataset (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.014). The analysis was done with a pipeline based on the multi-purpose image analysis software Endrov (https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2478), which further is needed to browse the raw recording data. Thumbnail movies were also generated, using maximum Z projection for the 3D fluorescence channel. Raw recordings available in the Endrov OST-file format are available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BIAD191?query=S-BIAD191 | |||
| Expr1170051 | Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy was performed, including DIC for morphology. Gene expression patterns were summarized in 4 manners: Average over time, Average over time and at different positions along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis, a voxelized representation over time, and on individual cells overlaid from a reference coordinate dataset (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.014). The analysis was done with a pipeline based on the multi-purpose image analysis software Endrov (https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2478), which further is needed to browse the raw recording data. Thumbnail movies were also generated, using maximum Z projection for the 3D fluorescence channel. Raw recordings available in the Endrov OST-file format are available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BIAD191?query=S-BIAD191 | |||
| Expr10243 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr10245 | Inferred expression. EPIC dataset. http://epic.gs.washington.edu/ Large-scale cellular resolution compendium of gene expression dynamics throughout development. This reporter was inferred to be expressing in this cell or one of its embryonic progenitor cells as described below. To generate a compact description of which cells express a particular reporter irrespective of time, the authors defined a metric "peak expression" for each of the 671 terminal ("leaf") cells born during embryogenesis. For each of these cells, the peak expression is the maximal reporter intensity observed in that cell or any of its ancestors; this has the effect of transposing earlier expression forward in time to the terminal set of cells. This metric allows straightforward comparisons of genes' cellular and lineal expression overlap, even when the expression occurs with different timing and despite differences in the precise time point that curation ended in different movies, at the cost of ignoring the temporal dynamics of expression, a topic that requires separate treatment. For simplicity, the authors use the term "expressing cells" to mean the number of leaf cells (of 671) with peak expression greater than background (2000 intensity units) and at least 10% of the maximum expression in that embryo. Quantitative expression data for all cells are located here: ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/murray2012/ | |||
| Expr1146117 | Developmental gene expression time-course. Raw data can be downloaded from ftp://caltech.wormbase.org/pub/wormbase/datasets-published/hashimshony2015 |
16 GO Annotation
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| enables | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00001534) | enables |
| enables | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00003848),occurs_in(WBbt:0005672) | involved_in |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| part_of(WBbt:0005672)|part_of(WBbt:0005663) | located_in |
19 Homologues
| Type |
|---|
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
| orthologue |
16 Ontology Annotations
| Annotation Extension | Qualifier |
|---|---|
| enables | |
| involved_in | |
| enables | |
| enables | |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00001534) | enables |
| enables | |
| located_in | |
| located_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| has_input(WB:WBGene00003848),occurs_in(WBbt:0005672) | involved_in |
| involved_in | |
| involved_in | |
| located_in | |
| part_of(WBbt:0005672)|part_of(WBbt:0005663) | located_in |