WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003272 Gene Name  mir-44
Sequence Name  ? ZK930.10 Brief Description  mir-44 encodes a microRNA, a small non-protein coding RNA and is conserved in C. briggsae; mir-44 is part of the mir-42-mir-44 cluster of miRNAs; mir-44 is expressed at all life stages; many of the known microRNAs are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of genes; the precise function of mir-44 is not known.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Expressed in seam cell.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position 
Length (nt)  ? 96
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003272

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:ZK930.10a ZK930.10a 22   II: 11890038-11890059
Transcript:ZK930.10b ZK930.10b 21   II: 11890083-11890103
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

7 Allele

Public Name
gk963801
gk963053
gk962684
gk963539
nDf49
gk500562
gk681483

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
II Caenorhabditis elegans 15279421  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00003272 11890023 11890118 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrII_11890119..11890453   335 II: 11890119-11890453 Caenorhabditis elegans

26 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in coelomocyte. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_coelomocyte
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in VC1743[mett-10(ok2204)] comparing to in N2 when animals grow on peptone-rich (NA22) plates. DESeq2, p-value < 0.05, fold change > 2. WBPaper00061357:mett-10(ok2204)_upregulated_NA22
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly higher expression (log2fold > 2, padj < 0.01) in hermaphrodite gonad (somatic gonad plus germine) than in male gonad (somatic gonad plus germine). DESeq2 v1.13.8, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.01. WBPaper00056161:hermaphrodite_enriched_miRNA
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
  miRNAs with age dependent abundance in wild type animals. Details available in Supplementary material of the paper. Diff Exp, is the approximate ratio of expression comparing Young to Old animals (11 day difference in age). The raw p-value is for the null hypothesis that the Diff exp Ratio = 1 (based on robust inference - see supplemental information) and the associated 95% CI of the ratio. WBPaper00042527:age_dependent_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L3
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L4
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in body wall muscle. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_BodyWallMuscle
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in neuron. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_neuron
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in drsh-1(ok369) comparing to in N2. Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00055896:drsh-1(ok369)_upregulated

5 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
Picture: Fig. 3D,E.   Expr8332 Pmir-42-44 drives GFP expression in embryos and throughout development. In larval stages, expression was detected in hypodermal seam cells.  
    Expr8451 Expression seen in early embryos and continuing through adulthood. In the embryo, expression is seeing as stripes on the outside part of the embryo. In the mid embryo stage, gfp is seeing on dorsal and ventral part of the embryo, including head. Late embryos show complex expression. Strong expression in seam cells and vulva. Weaker expression in hypodermis. Also seeing in posterior intestine and rectum and dnc.  
    Expr10892    
mir-44 and mir-45 encode the same mRNA.   Expr1662 Constitutive expression in L1, L2, L3, L4 and adults.  
    Expr2541 Intense signals were detected in embryos, larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4), and glp-4(bn2) adults. Faint signal detected in adults.  

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00003272 11890023 11890118 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
96

1 Sequence Ontology Term