WormMine

WS294

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003267 Gene Name  mir-39
Sequence Name  ? Y62F5A.6 Brief Description  mir-39 encodes a microRNA, a small non-protein codong RNA; mir-39 has a potential C. briggsae ortholog; mir-39 is part of the mir-35-mir-41 cluster of miRNAs and functions redundantly with other members of this cluster to control embryonic development; mir-39 is highly expressed in the embryo and in young adults with eggs, but not at other developmental stages.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Expressed in germ line.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position  II :3.7001 ±0.008008
Length (nt)  ? 87
Paste the following link
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Lists
This Gene isn't in any lists. Upload a list.

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003267

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:Y62F5A.6a Y62F5A.6a 22   II: 11538103-11538124
Transcript:Y62F5A.6b Y62F5A.6b 22   II: 11538143-11538164
 

Other

0 CDSs

1 RNAi Result

WormBase ID
WBRNAi00021224

7 Allele

Public Name
gk963801
gk963053
gk962684
gk963539
gk963482
gk262
nDf50

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
II Caenorhabditis elegans 15279421  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003267 11538089 11538175 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

0 Downstream Intergenic Region

35 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L3 larva comparing to in N2 L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in hypodermis. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_hypodermis
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade, comparing to in N2 animals at 26 centigrade. DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_N2_26C_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly higher expression (log2fold > 2, padj < 0.01) in hermaphrodite gonad (somatic gonad plus germine) than in male gonad (somatic gonad plus germine). DESeq2 v1.13.8, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.01. WBPaper00056161:hermaphrodite_enriched_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from L1 larva to young adult. DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change. WBPaper00045019:MWCNT_upregulated
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in neuron. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_neuron
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_N2
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade than in 15 centigrade. DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_15C_downregulated
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
12 hour starvation miRNA that showed significantly increated expression after 12 hour starvation in L4 larva stage. Fold change was calculated by dividing the higher counts per million by the lower, but adding the sign from the logFC to indicate direction. Authors only considered miRNA regions with at least 1 reads per-million from one of the libraries. These were tested for differential expression using the edgeR package, setting the common dispersion to 0.1 (since they did not have biological replicates) and normalizing with the TMM method. False Discovery Rates were calculated using the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure. WBPaper00048790:12h-starvation_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in hrpk-1(zen17) comparing to in N2 at embryo stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(zen17)_downregulated_miRNA_embryo
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L1 larva comparing to in N2 embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
Heat Shock: 35C 4 hours at L4 larva stage. Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after L4 larva N2 animals were heat stressed at 35C for 4 hours DESeq2 WBPaper00057154:HeatShock_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2

3 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr2534 No signal was detected in larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4) and glp-4(bn2) adults. Intense signals detected in embryos and adults.  
For this miRNA, longer species with mobilities expected for the respective foldback RNAs also appear to be expressed in the germ line; these longer RNAs were observed in wild-type L4 larvae (which have proliferating germ cells) but not in germ linedeficient mutant animals.   Expr1657 Highly expressed in the embryo and in young adults with eggs, but not at other developmental stages.  
    Expr10901    

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003267 11538089 11538175 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
87

1 Sequence Ontology Term