WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003270 Gene Name  mir-42
Sequence Name  ? ZK930.8 Brief Description  mir-42 encodes a microRNA, a small non-protein coding RNA and is conserved in C. briggsae; mir-42 is part of the mir-42-mir-44 cluster of miRNAs; mir-42 is expressed predominantly in the embryo; many of the known microRNAs are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of genes; the precise function of mir-42 is not known.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Expressed in seam cell.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position  II :4.13201 ±0.002664
Length (nt)  ? 95
Paste the following link
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Lists
This Gene isn't in any lists. Upload a list.

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003270

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:ZK930.8a ZK930.8a 25   II: 11889824-11889848
Transcript:ZK930.8b ZK930.8b 22   II: 11889870-11889891
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

11 Allele

Public Name
gk963801
gk963053
gk962684
gk963539
WBVar01605182
gk177
gk156148
gk380239
nDf49
gk819953
gk709380

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
II Caenorhabditis elegans 15279421  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003270 11889811 11889905 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

0 Downstream Intergenic Region

31 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_upregulated_adult
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade, comparing to in N2 animals at 26 centigrade. DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_N2_26C_downregulated
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in hrpk-1(tm5522) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(tm5522)_upregulated_miRNA_L4
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood mir-71(n4115) animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_mir-71(n4115)
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_N2
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade than in 15 centigrade. DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_15C_downregulated
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L1 larva comparing to in N2 embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  miRNAs in F1 generation down regulated by exposure to 20uM and 20mM nicotine during F0 generation. Statistical analysis was based on t-test for independent samples via SPSS to compare each of the nicotine treatments with control (i.e. low vs. control and high vs. control). Welch test correction was performed to account for unequal variance in each of the compared groups (control and treatment). In addition, to increase the statistical stringency, miRNAs differential expression was deemed significant only if it fulfilled two criteria: p value , 0.05 and expression changed by at least 50% relative to control. WBPaper00049006:nicotine_downregulated_F1
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_downregulated_adult
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 miRNAs up regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. N.A. WBPaper00046303:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L2_vs_L1_downregulated_adult
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from L1 larva to young adult. DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change. WBPaper00045019:MWCNT_downregulated
  microRNAs that showed significantly altered expression in myrf-1(ju1121) comparing to in control animals. DESeq2, FDR < 0.05. WBPaper00066953:myrf-1(ju1121)_regulated_miRNA
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression after exposure to graphene oxide (GO) The dysregulated expression of miRNAs in GO-exposed nematodes was analyzed by DESeq (an R package, a powerful tool to estimate the variance and test for differential expression). The data were extracted as up- or down-regulated miRNAs according to a cutoff of 2 fold change, and were presented in the scatter diagram after normalization. WBPaper00045209:graphene-oxide_downregulated
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_downregulated_adult

5 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
Picture: Fig. 3D,E.   Expr8332 Pmir-42-44 drives GFP expression in embryos and throughout development. In larval stages, expression was detected in hypodermal seam cells.  
    Expr8451 Expression seen in early embryos and continuing through adulthood. In the embryo, expression is seeing as stripes on the outside part of the embryo. In the mid embryo stage, gfp is seeing on dorsal and ventral part of the embryo, including head. Late embryos show complex expression. Strong expression in seam cells and vulva. Weaker expression in hypodermis. Also seeing in posterior intestine and rectum and dnc.  
    Expr10904    
    Expr1660 Highly expressed in the embryo, constitutive expression in L1, L2, L3, L4 and adults.  
    Expr2537 No signal detected in adults and glp-4(bn2) adults. Faint signals were detected larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4). Intense signal detected in emrbyos.  

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003270 11889811 11889905 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
95

1 Sequence Ontology Term