WormMine

WS295

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00045343 Gene Name  mir-786
Sequence Name  ? C39D10.12 Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans
Automated Description  Expressed in intestinal cell. Biotype  SO:0001265
Genetic Position  X :-1.01793 ±0.008506 Length (nt)  ? 90
Paste the following link
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Lists
This Gene isn't in any lists. Upload a list.

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00045343

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:C39D10.12a C39D10.12a 24   X: 7882766-7882789
Transcript:C39D10.12b C39D10.12b 23   X: 7882804-7882826
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

11 Allele

Public Name
gk964260
gk962707
gk964193
gk964194
gk963896
gk963732
gk964088
gk964087
WBVar01883882
n4541
WBVar01816104

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
X Caenorhabditis elegans 17718942  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00045343 7882751 7882840 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

1 Downstream Intergenic Region

WormBase ID Name Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location Organism
intergenic_region_chrX_7882841..7884293   1453 X: 7882841-7884293 Caenorhabditis elegans

25 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. 24 hours of exposure. Small RNAs (21-26nt) that showed significantly increased expression after L4 animals were exposed to P .aeruginosa strain PA14 for 24 hours. DESeq2, FDR < 0.05 WBPaper00056868:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_smallRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in hrpk-1(zen17) comparing to in N2 at embryo stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(zen17)_downregulated_miRNA_embryo
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
Heat Shock: 35C 4 hours at L4 larva stage. Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after L4 larva N2 animals were heat stressed at 35C for 4 hours DESeq2 WBPaper00057154:HeatShock_downregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_upregulated_adult
  miRNAs in F1 generation down regulated by exposure to 20uM and 20mM nicotine during F0 generation. Statistical analysis was based on t-test for independent samples via SPSS to compare each of the nicotine treatments with control (i.e. low vs. control and high vs. control). Welch test correction was performed to account for unequal variance in each of the compared groups (control and treatment). In addition, to increase the statistical stringency, miRNAs differential expression was deemed significant only if it fulfilled two criteria: p value , 0.05 and expression changed by at least 50% relative to control. WBPaper00049006:nicotine_downregulated_F1
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 miRNAs up regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. N.A. WBPaper00046303:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNAs in F1 generation up regulated by exposure to 20uM and 20mM nicotine during F0 generation. Statistical analysis was based on t-test for independent samples via SPSS to compare each of the nicotine treatments with control (i.e. low vs. control and high vs. control). Welch test correction was performed to account for unequal variance in each of the compared groups (control and treatment). In addition, to increase the statistical stringency, miRNAs differential expression was deemed significant only if it fulfilled two criteria: p value , 0.05 and expression changed by at least 50% relative to control. WBPaper00049006:nicotine_upregulated_F1
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in body wall muscle. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_BodyWallMuscle
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L4 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L4_vs_L3_upregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L3 larva comparing to in N2 L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L3_vs_L2_upregulated_adult
  miRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after 48 hour treatment in 10uM sanguinarine. Fold change > 2. WBPaper00055663:sanguinarine_upregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L4 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_adult_vs_L4_upregulated_adult

3 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
Picture: Fig 2A.   Expr8399 Northern blot temporal expression: L4 to adult-NA.  
    Expr8423 Expression detected from L3 to adulthood. Expression seen in somatic cells at uterus, ovary, spermatheca, spermatheca/uterus valve and gonadal sheath.  
    Expr10593 Consistent GFP expression was observed in the posteriormost int9 intestinal cells. Weaker expression was observed with lower penetrance in the four cells of the anteriormost int1 intestinal cells. No expression was observed in the body-wall muscle, enteric muscle, or neurons.  

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00045343 7882751 7882840 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
90

1 Sequence Ontology Term