WormMine

WS294

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00077725 Gene Name  mir-1832.1
Sequence Name  ? C18D11.11 Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans
Automated Description  Is affected by several genes including prg-1; glp-4; and alg-5 based on RNA-seq studies. Is affected by silicon dioxide nanoparticle based on microarray studies. Biotype  SO:0001265
Genetic Position  III :13.2606± Length (nt)  ? 64
Quick Links:
 
Quick Links:
 

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00077725

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:C18D11.11a C18D11.11a 23   III: 11829248-11829270
Transcript:C18D11.11b C18D11.11b 21   III: 11829291-11829311
 

Other

0 CDSs

23 RNAi Result

WormBase ID
WBRNAi00073942
WBRNAi00073943
WBRNAi00073944
WBRNAi00073945
WBRNAi00073946
WBRNAi00073947
WBRNAi00073948
WBRNAi00073949
WBRNAi00040926
WBRNAi00024590
WBRNAi00075217
WBRNAi00075216
WBRNAi00066341
WBRNAi00072350
WBRNAi00007084
WBRNAi00029069
WBRNAi00111623
WBRNAi00072351
WBRNAi00072352
WBRNAi00002640
WBRNAi00008419
WBRNAi00064400
WBRNAi00057569

6 Allele

Public Name
gk963887
gk963147
gk964363
gk964364
gk963799
gk493146

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
III Caenorhabditis elegans 13783801  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00077725 11829248 11829311 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

0 Downstream Intergenic Region

14 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ogt-1(ok1474) neuronal cells isolated by FACs comparing to in FACs isolated neuronal cells from wild type. DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. WBPaper00066485:ogt-1(ok1474)_upregulated_neuron
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade than in 15 centigrade. DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_15C_downregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L4 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L4_vs_L3_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L3
Fasting for 48 hours, from 3 days post L4 to 5 days post L4. MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression after 48 hours of fasting p < 0.0002, Fishers exact test. WBPaper00051247:fasting_upregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in animals after 24 hour exposure to 100ug per ml silica nanoparticles (SiNPs). The random variance model (RVM)t-test was applied toidentify differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAsbetween the SiNPs-treated group and the control group. P-value <0.05 and fold change (FC) >1.5 were considered as the threshold screening between the SiNP-treated groupand the control group. WBPaper00060100:SiNP_upregulated_miRNA

0 Expression Patterns

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier
Start End Strand
WBGene00077725 11829248 11829311 1

0 Ontology Annotations

0 Regulates Expr Cluster

1 Sequence

Length
64

1 Sequence Ontology Term