|
Neuronally enriched transcripts according to a comparison of neuronal nuclei IP samples to total nuclei using isolation of nuclei from tagged specific cell types (INTACT) technology. |
DESEQ2, fold change > 2 and FDR < 0.01. |
WBPaper00062103:neuron_enriched
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. |
DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. |
WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
|
|
Potental DAF-12 target genes identified by ChIP-chip analysis performed on strain ALF4 [daf-12 |
Affymetrix TAS software that computed for each probe estimates of fold enrichment (in linear scale) over hybridization with input DNA. At the same time, TAS calculated for each probe a p-value by applying a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A threshold of 2.5 was selected, which corresponds to probe intensities approximately 2.5 times stronger on the ChIP array than on the Input array. Additional TAS threshold parameters were MinRun=180 bp, MaxGap=300 bp. TAS analysis showed that the selected threshold of 2.5 corresponds approximately to a p-value of 0.01. |
WBPaper00040221:DAF-12_target_ALF4
|
|
Transcripts that showed significantly decreased expression in mrps-5(RNAi) animals comparing to animals injected with empty vector. |
Differential expression was assessed using a Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) using mixomics setting a variable of importance (VIP) score of greater than 1 as significant. |
WBPaper00059328:mrps-5(RNAi)_downregulated_mRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_downregulated_adult
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in intestine. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_upregulated_intestine
|
|
Potental DAF-12 target genes identified by ChIP-chip analysis performed on strain ALF9 [daf-12 |
Affymetrix TAS software that computed for each probe estimates of fold enrichment (in linear scale) over hybridization with input DNA. At the same time, TAS calculated for each probe a p-value by applying a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A threshold of 2.5 was selected, which corresponds to probe intensities approximately 2.5 times stronger on the ChIP array than on the Input array. Additional TAS threshold parameters were MinRun=180 bp, MaxGap=300 bp. TAS analysis showed that the selected threshold of 2.5 corresponds approximately to a p-value of 0.01. |
WBPaper00040221:DAF-12_target_ALF9
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly altered expression in hsf-1(+);+HS vs hsf-1(RNAi);+HS. Worms remained on RNAi plates until the L4 larval-stage before being heat shocked by submerging plates in a 33C water bath for 30 minutes. |
The Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing was then used to determine significantly altered miRNAs between each treatment condition. Micro RNAs with q-value < 0.05 was considered differentially expressed. |
WBPaper00052959:hsf-1(RNAi)_regulated_miRNA_HS-dependent
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_upregulated_adult
|
|
miRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in pry-1(mu38) comparing to in N2. |
Fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05 |
WBPaper00057033:pry-1(mu38)_upregulated
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L1 larva comparing to in N2 embryo. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_upregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_upregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_upregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L4 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L4_vs_L3_downregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_adult
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L3
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L4
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in mir-71(n4115) comparing to in N2 at 4-days post L4 adult hermaphrodite. |
Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. |
WBPaper00053318:mir-71(n4115)_upregulated_miRNA
|
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 |
miRNAs up regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00046303:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in neuron. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_neuron
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in drsh-1(ok369) comparing to in N2. |
Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00055896:drsh-1(ok369)_upregulated
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L4 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L4_vs_L3_upregulated_adult
|