WormMine

WS294

Intermine data mining platform for C. elegans and related nematodes

Gene :

WormBase Gene ID  ? WBGene00003337 Gene Name  mir-243
Sequence Name  ? R08C7.14 Brief Description  mir-243 encodes a microRNA, a small non-protein coding RNA; mir-243 is strongly expressed at all life stages in normal worms and in glp-4(bn2) mutant worms; many of the known microRNAs are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of genes; the precise function of miR-243 is unknown.
Organism  Caenorhabditis elegans Automated Description  Is affected by several genes including stau-1; prg-1; and hrpk-1 based on tiling array and RNA-seq studies. Is affected by nicotine; multi-walled carbon nanotube; and sanguinarine based on quantitative PCR and RNA-seq studies.
Biotype  SO:0001265 Genetic Position  IV :0.347365 ±0.014705
Length (nt)  ? 98
Paste the following link
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Quick Links:
SummaryGenomicsOther
 
Lists
This Gene isn't in any lists. Upload a list.

1 Organism

Name Taxon Id
Caenorhabditis elegans 6239

1 Synonyms

Value
WBGene00003337

Genomics

2 Transcripts

WormMine ID Sequence Name Length (nt) Chromosome Location
Transcript:R08C7.14a R08C7.14a 19   IV: 4450798-4450816
Transcript:R08C7.14b R08C7.14b 23   IV: 4450839-4450861
 

Other

0 CDSs

0 RNAi Result

5 Allele

Public Name
gk963722
gk963908
n4759
gk650395
gk200143

1 Chromosome

WormBase ID Organism Length (nt)
IV Caenorhabditis elegans 17493829  

1 Chromosome Location


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003337 4450779 4450876 1

2 Data Sets

Name URL
WormBaseAcedbConverter  
C. elegans genomic annotations (GFF3 Gene)  

0 Downstream Intergenic Region

39 Expression Clusters

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  miRNA with decreased expression in N2 L3 larva comparing to in N2 L2 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in ilc-17.1(syb5296) comparing to in N2 animals at L4 larva stage. DESeq2, fold change > 2, FDR < 0.05. WBPaper00066594:ilc-17.1(syb5296)_upregulated
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. 24 hours of exposure. Small RNAs (21-26nt) that showed significantly increased expression after L4 animals were exposed to P .aeruginosa strain PA14 for 24 hours. DESeq2, FDR < 0.05 WBPaper00056868:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_smallRNA
  Potental DAF-12 target genes identified by ChIP-chip analysis performed on strain ALF4 [daf-12 Affymetrix TAS software that computed for each probe estimates of fold enrichment (in linear scale) over hybridization with input DNA. At the same time, TAS calculated for each probe a p-value by applying a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A threshold of 2.5 was selected, which corresponds to probe intensities approximately 2.5 times stronger on the ChIP array than on the Input array. Additional TAS threshold parameters were MinRun=180 bp, MaxGap=300 bp. TAS analysis showed that the selected threshold of 2.5 corresponds approximately to a p-value of 0.01. WBPaper00040221:DAF-12_target_ALF4
  Transcripts that showed significantly increased expression in alh-4(hj221) deletion allele comparing to in N2. N.A. WBPaper00061653:alh-4(hj221)_upregulated
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L2 larva comparing to in N2 L1 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L2_vs_L1_upregulated_adult
  Micro RNAs that showed significantly increased expression in hrpk-1(tm5522) comparing to in N2 at L4 larva stage. DESeq, fold change > 2, p-value <= 0.05. WBPaper00058673:hrpk-1(tm5522)_upregulated_miRNA_L4
  micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
  miRNA that showed increased expression after 20mM nicotine treatment Statistical analysis was based on t-test for independent samples via SPSS. The results were further narrowed based on two criteria. Only the genes whose expression changed with a P < 0.05 and a fold change > 0.5, when compared to control, were considered as differentially expressed. Fold change was calculated as 2**(DeltaCt(treatment)-DeltaCt(control))-1. DeltaCt = Ct(miRNA)-Ct(aveMRNA). WBPaper00042480:20mM_nicotine_upregulated
Fasting for 48 hours, from 3 days post L4 to 5 days post L4. MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after 48 hours of fasting p < 0.0002, Fishers exact test. WBPaper00051247:fasting_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood mir-71(n4115) animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_mir-71(n4115)
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. WBPaper00053318:Aging_upregulated_miRNA_N2
  miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
  miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_downregulated_miRNA
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_adult
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_embryo
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L1
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L2
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L3
  miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_downregulated_L4
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
  miRNA with increased expression in N2 L4 larva comparing to in N2 L3 larva. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_L4_vs_L3_upregulated_adult
  miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after 48 hour treatment in 10uM sanguinarine. Fold change > 2. WBPaper00055663:sanguinarine_downregulated
  MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_upregulated_adult
  miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_adult

3 Expression Patterns

Remark Reporter Gene Primary Identifier Pattern Subcellular Localization
    Expr8426 Expressed from mid embryo continuing through adulthood. Expressed very strongly in intestine. Also expressed in dnc and valve between spermatheca and uterus.  
    Expr2510 Intense signals were detected in embryos, larval stages (L1, L2, L3, L4), adults, and glp-4(bn2) adults.  
    Expr10955    

0 GO Annotation

0 Homologues

1 Locations


Feature . Primary Identifier 		Start End Strand
WBGene00003337 4450779 4450876 1

0 Ontology Annotations

2 Regulates Expr Cluster

Regulated By Treatment Description Algorithm Primary Identifier
  Genes down regulated by mir-243(n4759). RNAs that changed at least 2-fold with a probability of p > 0.05 in three biological replicates were considered differentially regulated between wild-type and mir-243. WBPaper00036130:mir-243_down_regulated
  Genes up regulated by mir-243(n4759). RNAs that changed at least 2-fold with a probability of p > 0.05 in three biological replicates were considered differentially regulated between wild-type and mir-243. WBPaper00036130:mir-243_up_regulated

1 Sequence

Length
98

1 Sequence Ontology Term