|
|
Potental DAF-12 target genes identified by ChIP-chip analysis performed on strain ALF4 [daf-12 |
Affymetrix TAS software that computed for each probe estimates of fold enrichment (in linear scale) over hybridization with input DNA. At the same time, TAS calculated for each probe a p-value by applying a Wilcoxon signed rank test. A threshold of 2.5 was selected, which corresponds to probe intensities approximately 2.5 times stronger on the ChIP array than on the Input array. Additional TAS threshold parameters were MinRun=180 bp, MaxGap=300 bp. TAS analysis showed that the selected threshold of 2.5 corresponds approximately to a p-value of 0.01. |
WBPaper00040221:DAF-12_target_ALF4
|
|
|
Genes with small RNAs upregulated in all four meg-3(ax3055) meg-4(ax3052) strains comparing to N2 |
DESeq2 |
WBPaper00057162:meg-3_meg-4_upregulated_sRNA
|
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in intestine. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_intestine
|
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in N2 1-day post L4 adult hermaphrodite comparing to in N2 L4 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_N2_adult_vs_L4_downregulated_adult
|
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in hypodermis. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_hypodermis
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
micro RNAs that exhibit changes in expression during adulthood (p-value < = 0.05). |
Authors searched for targets with seed matches of perfect Watson-Crick base-pair complementarity to positions two-eight of the miRNAs (counting from the 5' end). In order to consider these seed matches as potential target sites, authors required a minimal cut-off for binding specificity of the remainder of the miRNA to the target. Recent evidence suggests that this is not required for function in humans, but 3' binding does occur in studies of C. elegans. Authors used the scoring algorithm from Robins et al. (2005). The binding cut-off is determined by creating a second-order Markov model of the background for the 3' UTRs. The cut off was p-value < = 0.05. |
WBPaper00028344:adult_expr_change
|
|
|
miRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in glp-4(bn2) at 26 centigrade than in 15 centigrade. |
DESeq2 q-value < 0.05. |
WBPaper00049990:glp-4(bn2)_26C_vs_15C_downregulated
|
|
|
miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
|
|
|
miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2. |
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical. |
WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-2(ok304), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-2(ok304)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_downregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L1 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) embryo. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L1_vs_embryo_downregulated_adult
|
|
|
miRNA with decreased expression in prg-1(wm161) L3 larva comparing to in prg-1(wm161) L2 larva. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_L3_vs_L2_downregulated_adult
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_embryo
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L2
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in Day 5 (5-days post-L4) vs. Day 0 (L4 larva) of adulthood N2 animals. |
Differential expression for both small RNA- and mRNA-seq data was tested using DESeq2; P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by Benjamini-Hochberg method. |
WBPaper00053318:Aging_downregulated_miRNA_N2
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(ram2), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(ram2)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_adult
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L1
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L3
|
|
|
miRNA with increased expression in prg-1(wm161) comparing to in N2. |
DEGseq and GFOLD were used to analyze miRNAs expression. Authors chose miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (P < 0.001, q < 0.01 of Storey) from DEGseq, and miRNAs which had more than two-fold difference in expression (GFOLD score > 0 for up-regulation and GFOLD score < 0 for down-regulation) from GFOLD outcomes. Then authors obtained the intersection of up-regulated miRNAs and down-regulated miRNAs for each stage from the chosen miRNAs, respectively. |
WBPaper00045316:miRNA_prg-1_upregulated_L4
|
|
Bacteria infection: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 |
miRNAs up regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. |
N.A. |
WBPaper00046303:P.aeruginosa_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-5(tm1163), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-5(tm1163)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly decreased expression after animals were exposed to 1 mg per liter multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from L1 larva to young adult. |
DESeq, cut-off of 2-fold change. |
WBPaper00045019:MWCNT_downregulated
|
|
|
miRNAs that showed decreased expression after exposure to graphene oxide (GO) |
The dysregulated expression of miRNAs in GO-exposed nematodes was analyzed by DESeq (an R package, a powerful tool to estimate the variance and test for differential expression). The data were extracted as up- or down-regulated miRNAs according to a cutoff of 2 fold change, and were presented in the scatter diagram after normalization. |
WBPaper00045209:graphene-oxide_downregulated
|
|
|
MicroRNAs that showed significantly increased expression in alg-1(gk214), comparing to in N2. |
DESeq2, Fold change > 1.5. |
WBPaper00051404:alg-1(gk214)_upregulated_miRNA
|
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in body wall muscle. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_BodyWallMuscle
|
|
|
Micro RNAs that showed significantly decreased expression in day 8 adults comparing to in day 1 adults in neuron. |
Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq based on unique molecular identifier (UMI). A minimum UMI sum of 10 in 3 replicates was set as the threshold of expression. MiRNAs with more than five reads were defined as expressed. Differential expression of miRNAs was analysed by t-test (P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 or < 0.67) after Box-Cox transformation. MiRNA targets were identified by TargetScanWorm (Release 6.2) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient smaller than -0.2. |
WBPaper00066447:Day8_vs_Day1_downregulated_neuron
|
